{"id":8682,"date":"2024-11-29T07:24:20","date_gmt":"2024-11-29T13:24:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.podles.org\/dialogue\/?p=8682"},"modified":"2024-11-29T07:24:20","modified_gmt":"2024-11-29T13:24:20","slug":"misinformation-c-1900","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.podles.org\/dialogue\/misinformation-c-1900-8682.htm","title":{"rendered":"Misinformation c. 1900"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In researching my wife\u2019s extensive Lawrence clan, I came across a 1902 murder case.<\/p>\n<p>The facts briefly were:<\/p>\n<p>The 17-year-old Sarah Ray Lawrence, aka Dimples, was the daughter of a moderately prosperous insurance executive. While summering in Good Ground, Long Island, she had a habit of disappearing, supposedly visiting relatives, but in fact going off with boyfriends.<\/p>\n<p>The boyfriends happened\u00a0 to be 20-something married men. One, Clarence Foster, was a local who worked for the \u00a0hotels ferrying people around on the water. \u00a0He had been married only a few months, but his wife was sick, so he amused himself with Dimples. The other, Louis Disbrow, was the son of a meat merchant. He had married a 16-year-old about 5 years previously and quit his job to move in with his in-laws. When his father-in-law insisted Louis get a job, Louis moved and left the wife behind.<\/p>\n<p>The three, Louis, Clarence, and Dimp went out on the water together and had a rollicking good time. On June 9 they went out dining and drinking. Afterwards there was a quarrel and a fight between the two rivals, and Clarence and Dimp went off in a leaky skiff. Their bodies turned up in the water a few days later. Louis, who had been passing bad checks all over town, absented himself and was suspected of and indicted for murder.<\/p>\n<p>There were thousands of articles all over the country about this sordid affair. These were the Gilded Youth of Society, maybe in a m\u00e9nage \u00e0 trois, misbehaving and even murdering.<\/p>\n<p>The <em>Brooklyn Eagle<\/em> was a reputable paper, and on June 19, 1902 it decided it was necessary to preach a little.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe first province of a newspaper is to print the news. This is a truism which, in these days of sensation-mongering,\u00a0 may be repeated definitely to the benefit of all\u00a0 and to the detriment of none. Nothing is gained by the distortion of fact or by the magnification of the unimportant.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cCertain newspapers \u2026 are more than anxious that the lamentable tragedy at Good Ground should turn out to have been a double murder.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBut supposing that Clarence Foster and Sarah Lawrence were murdered,\u00a0 what is the use of lending a fictitious interest\u00a0 to the case by misstatement.\u00a0 Foster has been described as an \u201camateur yachtsman\u201d of such extraordinary skill that he was invariably barred out of all club contests on Shinnecock Bay. Miss Lawrence was described as a \u201cgreat beauty\u201d and an \u201cheiress.\u201d Both were \u201cfearless\u201d and \u201cskillful\u201d swimmers , therefore they could not have been accidentally drowned , and so on until\u00a0 the unintelligent reader lost\u00a0 sight of the most obvious explanation of the miserable affair, that a drunken baymen\u00a0 afloat in a leaky boat was unable to save either himself or his companion from the effects of an unexpected capsize. Foster was not an \u201camateur yachtsman,\u2019 with all the social status that the name implies. He made his living largely by sailing as the servant of others, and for this reason, and not because he was so expert at handling tiller or sheets, was he debarred from competitions\u00a0 limited to those who were amateurs within the accepted\u00a0 meaning of the term. He was just an ordinary swimmer, too, and Sarah Lawrence could not swim a stroke, so that death by drowning was quite possible, and, in fact, quite likely, under the known circumstances of the case. Miss Lawrence was not a beauty and she was not an heiress, and the attempt to make her either or both belongs to the category of misdirected effort mainly responsible for the delusion of that part of the public which daily invests faith and money in the purchase of yellow journals.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The most egregious example was the story that got circulated about a supposed eyewitness:<\/p>\n<p>A bayman named Otto Schwanecke later said that he was sleeping in a boat when he was awaked by the cries of men. From the cockpit of his catboat he saw two rowboats on the water. Each contained a man; they were fighting. One contained a woman; she was screaming for her companion to sit down before he capsized the boat, Schwanecke then saw an oar flash across the woman\u2019s head and hit her companion on the forehead. He fell into the water. Schwanecke cowered from fear in the cockpit. When it was quiet he looked up and saw an empty boat floating. Shortly he saw a man rowing toward shore; he beached his boat and ran into the trees.<\/p>\n<p>There was no such person and no such catboat. The story is a total fabrication.<\/p>\n<p>Disbrow was tried and acquitted after a 40-minute deliberation by the jury. His doctor testified that he had a serious arm injury and had difficulty moving that arm.<\/p>\n<p>But he had been tried and convicted in the press, and the millions who had read it never got the truth, and probably assumed that Society had protected its own.<\/p>\n<div id=\"themify_builder_content-8682\" data-postid=\"8682\" class=\"themify_builder_content themify_builder_content-8682 themify_builder themify_builder_front\">\r\n\t<\/div>\r\n<!-- \/themify_builder_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In researching my wife\u2019s extensive Lawrence clan, I came across a 1902 murder case. The facts briefly were: The 17-year-old Sarah Ray Lawrence, aka Dimples, was the daughter of a moderately prosperous insurance executive. While summering in Good Ground, Long Island, she had a habit of disappearing, supposedly visiting relatives, but in fact going off [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8682","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","has-post-title","has-post-date","has-post-category","has-post-tag","has-post-comment","has-post-author"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.podles.org\/dialogue\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8682","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.podles.org\/dialogue\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.podles.org\/dialogue\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.podles.org\/dialogue\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.podles.org\/dialogue\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8682"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.podles.org\/dialogue\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8682\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8683,"href":"https:\/\/www.podles.org\/dialogue\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8682\/revisions\/8683"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.podles.org\/dialogue\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8682"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.podles.org\/dialogue\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8682"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.podles.org\/dialogue\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8682"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}