Leon J. Podles :: DIALOGUE
A Discussion of Faith, Family, and Culture
RSS
  • Home
  • Archives
  • About
  • Podles.org

Music at St. Peter’s

April 20, 2008 in Music, Vatican 1 Comment

We were in Rome last week, and decided to attend the 10:30 sung mass at St. Peter’s. I had hopes because Benedict is a musician.

Several years I met an American musician who lived in Switzerland. He had negotiated with he Calvinist Cathedral in Geneva to host a Catholic choir, the first Catholic choir to sing there sinceteh Reformation. He wanted the Sistine Choir, but a friend warned him that he should go to Rome to hear them first. They were disappointingly mediocre. John Paul II had no ear for music. 

A schola sang at the high mass. They may have been good, but I couldn’t tell, as they used an amplification system so tinny that it sounded like an old car radio.

The elderly cardinal who said mass knew the music, but his voice was cracking with age.

Alas, is there no place in the Catholic world that has consistently good music – not spectacular, but sung on key, with everyone stopping and starting at the same time. I have not come across one yet.

Leave a Comment

The Vatican, Pope Benedict, and Sexual Abuse

April 20, 2008 in clergy sex abuse scandal, sexual abuse 6 Comments Tags: Benedict, bishops, clergy sexual abuse, pope, sexual abuse, Vatican

I have been mulling over the comments that Benedict has made about sexual abuse. His public acknowledgment of the evil of abuse, his acknowledgment that it was badly handled, and his meeting with victims were far more that John Paul II could bring himself to do. When one cardinal begged John Paul to make a public statement, he replied that he would like to, but “they wouldn’t let me.” The “they” in question are no doubt the Vatican bureaucrats who protected abusers for decades.

 

When Ratzinger became pope, he soon disciplined two prominent abusers, Maciel and Gino Burresi, both of whom had been protected by Vatican officials.  As I have read the correspondence of bishops and chancery officials from the past 50 years, it has become clear that even when a bishop wanted to laicize an abusive priest, he knew that the Vatican would place almost insurmountable obstacles in his way.  Perhaps this is why Benedict has not disciplined the bishops who enabled abusers: he knows that the American bishops were simply following the clear signals that they were getting from the Vatican. 

Why the Vatican was giving such signals is another question. John Allen thinks that it was simply the Italian desire to maintain a bella figura, to look good in public. Richard Sipe and Fr. Tom Doyle think that the Church is as corrupt now as it was just before the Reformation. Many clerics, including those at the highest levels, are unchaste, and have sexual secrets that do not want exposed. I think that in a segment of the clergy the practice of pederasty has been accepted from ancient times. The Romans, they claim, learned it from the Etruscans and Greeks. The clergy continued the practice. When Justinian made pederasty a capital crime, he immediately executed two bishops as an example to the rest. In the Middle Ages St. Peter Damian described the corruption of the clergy in the Book of Gomorrah.

Leave a Comment

Mene Mene… Germany Empties Out

March 31, 2008 in Germany, Population No Comments Tags: depopulation, Germany

The Germans are having to face the consequences of their failure to have children. The Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung reports that massive numbers of apartemts have to be demolished. There are now 82 million people living in Germany; by 2050 there will be only 70 million. Even by 2020 there will be 350,000 fewer households, and therefore a need for 350,000 fewer apartments. 

The population decline is masked because some cities, like Munich, are still growing. The eastern and northern regions of Germany are emptying out.

Leave a Comment

But in Switzerland?

March 22, 2008 in Uncategorized No Comments

Christoph Casetti, a canon of the diocese of Churr in Switzerland, according to Kath.net, has said that Switzerland needs many more exorcists. He sees more and more cases of possession. Perhaps the French anti-cult authorities are not being alarmist.

Leave a Comment

Just in Time for Easter

March 22, 2008 in Secularism, Uncategorized, Women in Church No Comments

Dietrich Bonheoffer denounced liberal Proetstantism because it preached cheap grace: “Cheap grace is preaching forgiveness without requiring repentance, baptism without church discipline, Communion without confession. … Cheap grace is grace without discipleship, grace without the cross, grace without Jesus Christ, living and incarnate.”

 A leading minister of the United Church in Canda has decided the the next step is “Taking Christ out of Christianity.”  Seriously. The Rev Gretta Vosper, of the West Hill United Church in Toronto, has decided to excise Jesus from the Easter liturgy: 

But at West Hill on the faith’s holiest day, it will be done with a huge difference. The words “Jesus Christ” will be excised from what the congregation sings and replaced with “Glorious hope.”Thus, it will be hope that is declared to be resurrected – an expression of renewal of optimism and the human spirit – but not Jesus, contrary to Christianity’s central tenet about the return to life on Easter morning of the crucified divine son of God.Generally speaking, no divine anybody makes an appearance in West Hill’s Sunday service liturgy. 

The Rev. Vosper wants to Schliermacherize Christianity completely:

She wants salvation redefined to mean new life through removing the causes of suffering in the world. She wants the church to define resurrection as “starting over,” “new chances.” She wants an end to the image of God as an intervening all-powerful authority who must be appeased to avoid divine wrath; rather she would have congregations work together as communities to define God – or god – according to their own worked-out definitions of what is holy and sacred. She wants the eucharist – the symbolic eating and drinking of Jesus’s body and blood to make the congregation part of Jesus’s body – to be instead a symbolic experience of community love.Theologians asked to comment on her book said they wouldn’t until they’ve read it. But one of her colleagues who knows her well, Rev. Rob Oliphant, the progressive pastor of Toronto’s Eglinton St. George’s United Church, said, “While I’m somewhat sympathetic to the aims of it all – getting rid of the nonsense and keeping the core faith – I think that there is something lacking in it all. Gone is metaphor, poetry, symbol, image, beauty, paradox.”

For some reason she thinks that the world will flock to this Christianity without Christ.   Vosper seems to unaware of her literary antecedents in Flannery O’Connor’s Wise Blood and the church of truth without Jesus Christ crucified. She might do well to read that story.

Leave a Comment

La France et le satanisme

March 18, 2008 in clergy sex abuse scandal, France No Comments Tags: France, Satanism

European governments keep a close eye on cults. The German government has kept a wary eye on Scientology. With more reason, the French government is keeping an eye on Satanism.  Le Monde reports that the “Mission interministérielle de vigilance et de lutte contre les dérives sectaires” (The interministerial mission of vigilance and combat against  sectarian deviances) estimates that there are 25,000 Satanists in France, of whom 80% are under 21 years of age. In 2007 there were 92 cases of Satanist profanation of cemeteries, a 300% increase in three years. Also increasing are “suicides among the young, deviant conduct (self-scarring), incitation to racial hatred, and barbaric acts, notably against animals.” 

Secularists are skeptical, and think that the government is alarmist; the alarmists classify black metal (heavy metal?) fans and Goths as Satanists, when all they are is adolescent rebels. The profanations of churches and cemeteries are, according to the secularist critics the work of neonazis and other sociopaths. 

The U. S. had its Satanist alarms in the 1980s. At the extreme fringes of sexual abuse among priests are reports of Satanism. A priest who wanted tone as transgressive as possible would, like the priest in Huysmans, would tend to use Satanic references. He would use them in the same spirit as the French adolescent rebels. But it is dangerous to call on the evil spirits. They may come.

Leave a Comment

Muddying the Waters

March 7, 2008 in sacraments No Comments Tags: Australia, baptism, feminism, illicit baptism, Jim Spence, Vatican

The Vatican issued a statement that baptisms performed using words that do not refer to the Father, Son, and Spirit are invalid. According to Zenit:

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith clarified that two formulae for baptism that remove the masculine names for God are invalid and undermine faith in the Trinity.

The congregation’s statement, made public today, responded to two questions concerning the validity of baptism conferred without referring to God the Father and Son.

The first question is: “Is a baptism valid if conferred with the words ‘I baptize you in the name of the Creator, and of the Redeemer, and of the Sanctifier,’ or ‘I baptize you in the name of the Creator, and of the Liberator, and of the Sustainer’?”

The second question is: “Must people baptized with those formulae be baptized ‘in forma absoluta’?”

The responses are: “To the first question, negative; to the second question, affirmative.”

That is, the use of the wrong words means that no baptism was performed. The person remains unbaptized, and cannot receive any other sacraments. If he went through the rites of confirmation and matrimony, he did not in fact receive those sacraments. He must be baptized, confirmed, and married for the first time.

But the Brisbane archdiocese in which most of these pseudo-baptisms were performed decided that the Vatican was wrong, the baptisms were valid, but illicit. According to the Chancellor Jim Spence in the Courier Mail:

The Catholic Archdiocese of Brisbane says the blunder may affect anyone baptised at the St Marys Catholic Church before 2004.
The notice has been issued after a fresh directive this week from the Catholic Church in Vatican City.
The baptisms used two illicit formulas: “I baptise you in the name of the Creator and of the Redeemer and of the Sanctifier and “I baptise you in the in the name of the Creator and of the Liberator and of the Sustainer.
The legitimate formula is “I baptise you in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.”
The chancellor of the diocese, Father Jim Spence, said the priests at the parish were ordered to revert to the traditional formula in 2004 but that some people may still be unaware their baptisms were wrongly administered.
He said he was unaware how many people it may affect. The church is currently considering whether there will be a need for those illicitly baptised to have the ritual legitimately.
“It doesn’t mean it’s invalid, it just means it’s illicit, he said.
“It doesn’t mean that it didn’t happen, it means that it shouldn’t have happened.
“I guess (those affected) would have all sorts of reactions. I would hope that anybody whos troubled by it would get in touch.”
Baptism, the first of seven sacraments in the church, is the rite of initiation into the church and is usually administered shortly after birth.
Fr Spence said the illicit baptisms did not invalidate subsequent sacraments, including confirmation, penance and marriage.

The laity of Australia have access ot the Internet, and can read the Vatican’s statement. They can choose between the authority of Jim Spence and Pope Benedict.

Leave a Comment

Augustine on the Clergy

March 6, 2008 in clergy sex abuse scandal No Comments Tags: Augustine, clergy

What the admirers of clerics see are devoted ministers, faithful stewards, men prepared to be patient with everyone, spending the love of their hearts on those they want to help, men who seek not their own interests but those of Jesus Christ. The observers praise such conduct but forget that these good men are interspersed among bad ones. Other onlookers censure the avarice of the clergy, their improper behavior and their quarrels, representing them as greedy for other people’s money, drunkards and gluttons.  You, the critic, are prejudiced in your vilification, just as you, the admirer, are injudicious in your praise.  You who eulogize the clergy must admit that there are bad men among them; you who revile them must see in their ranks there are good men too.  

Make no mistake, brothers and sisters,: if you do not want to be deceived, and aspire to love the brethren, be aware that there are dissemblers in every profession in the Church. I do not say that every person is a hypocrite, but that every profession has its hypocrites. There are bad Christians, but there are good Christians too. You seem to see more bad ones, because they are the chaff and they block your view of the grain. But the grains are there: look more closely, feel them, shake them out, and judge by the taste.

Leave a Comment

Gelmini the Melchite

March 5, 2008 in clergy sex abuse scandal, Italy No Comments Tags: Gelmini, sexual abuse. Melchite, Vatican

Like the Franciscan Bruce Ritter, Gelmini founded homes for the outcast and was accused of abusing young men. They also both managed to escape supervision. Ritter was a Franciscan, but the Franciscan assumed the Archdiocese of New York was keeping an eye on him, and the Archdiocese assumed the Franciscans were supervising him.

Gelmini said something odd which the the English language news reports garbled (no surprise).

He said, according La Republica,

“La decisione di ridurmi allo stato laico è stata solo mia. Io non appartengo alla diocesi di Terni: il vescovo di Terni, monsignor Paglia, che non ha alcuna giurisdizione su di me, per me è zero. Io appartengo alla chiesa cattolica melchita. Il mio superiore è il patriarca Gregorio III. Per me Paglia è solo il portalettere del Vaticano.

“The decision to reduce me to the lay state was mine alone. I do not belong to the diocese of Treni. The bishop of Terni, monsignor Paglia, does not have any jurisdiction ever me, for me he is nothing. I belong to the Melchite Catholic Church. My superior is the patriarch Gregory III. For me Paglia is simply the postman of the Vatican.

During the 1980s, when his community Incontro was growing rapidly, Gelmini had himself excardinated from the diocese of Grosetto and became a “mitered exarch” of the Melchite Catholic Church.

Therefore, nobody was keeping an eye on Gelmini. According to La Stampa, “Pressioni dal Vaticano su Don Gelmini” (9-17-07)

La conclusione dell’istruttoria operata in Vaticano, insomma, è che di fatto non c’è in Italia un vescovo o un parroco che sovrintenda a don Pierino. Ed è così da molti anni.

The conclusion of the Vatican inquiry, in sum, is that in fact there is not in Italy a bishop or pastor who supervises don Peirino, And has not been for many years.

I have not been able to find any explanation of why Gelmini became a Melchite; but the effect was that he had no one above him and acted completely independently.

Leave a Comment

An Italian Bruce Ritter

March 3, 2008 in clergy sex abuse scandal, sexual abuse 1 Comment Tags: Gelmini, sexual abuse

Pietro Gelmini (which news stories also spell Gelimini) founded centers for the homeless and drug addicts. He was prominent, popular, influential, and well connected to the Italian right, including Silvio Berluscone and Rocco Butiglione.

Then the accusations began. Young men said he had sexually abused them. He said that he had kicked them out for stealing, and that the accusations were the work of the Jews: “The truth is that, starting in the United States, a Jewish-radical chic offensive is underway aimed at discrediting the Catholic Church. Paedophiles are everywhere in society “ He then corrected himself. He “had meant to say a Masonic lobby instead of a Jewish one.”   Victorio Messori said that Italy was importing “an American obsession with pedophilia.” Cardinal Bertone said the charges were lies, all lies. 

Gelmini has just resigned from the priesthood so that, he has claimed, he can defend himself better. He has not explained, nor has anyone been able to explain why being voluntarily laicized makes it easier for him to defend himself.

Leave a Comment

Sacramental Validity

March 3, 2008 in Uncategorized No Comments

There is a very odd discussion at the Commonweal blog about the Vatican’s pointing out that the formula some priests are using: “I baptize you in the name of the Creator, Liberator, and Sustainer (or any such variant that omits the hated masculine names of Father and Son) is not   valid Christian baptism. It began very badly when the blogger David Gibson titled his comments Baptism, Shmaptism.      The use of this formula by priests shows a  deep misunderstanding of the Trinity, and  I would question whether such priests are in fact some  sort of modalist. Father, Son, and Spirit are the inner-Trinitarian names; Creator, Redeemer, Sanctifier name the action of the one God on us.  Those who have not been baptized in the name of the Father, Son, and Spirit have not received Christian baptism. Moreover, to receive any other Christian sacrament, a person must be validly baptized, initiated into the inner life of the Trinity at work in the Church.  God could certainly have chosen to act without any sacraments, any outward signs of his action, but he chooses to operate within and by actions (although he is certainly free to operate outside them. Remember how the pagans in Acts received the Spirit before they were baptized). The sacraments are not the only ways God chooses to act, but he assures us that he does act through the sacraments.   A person who is not baptized sacramentally may in fact be a believer, having received a baptism of desire (which is not sacramental and does not insert one into the sacramental order), and can receive the graces that are in the sacraments, but they do not come to him through the sacraments.  Most of the Catholics who were not validly baptized because of the use of a non-Trinitarian formula will be finally baptized. Some may have to have their marriages witnessed by the Church. Others (and this will create real problems) may have to be really ordained, since if they were not baptized, they could not be ordained.   That means that apart from baptism (which even a non-believer can perform), all other sacraments such putative priests performed were not really sacraments.  The real problem comes if a non-baptized person is consecrated a bishop, especially a bishop. Concerns about the apostolic succession, the historical link with the apostles, led to the use of multiple consecrators, in part to assure that if one consecrating bishop were invalidly consecrated or fraudulent, the other consecrating bishops would supply his deficiency. I am sure that has happened in the course of history. Fortunately the use of the non-Trinitarian formula is only about twenty years old, and it is unlikely that anyone who received such invalid baptism is now ordained. But for a while there may have to be a lot of conditional baptisms in Australia. This practice has been known to the hierarchy for decades, and only now is the Vatican doing anything. The current mess is the Vatican’s fault. The offending priests should have been removed at the very beginning when there were only a few doubtful baptisms. Now there are probably thousands of doubtful baptisms.  But even more importantly what the Commonweal discussion shows is that many Catholics think that the concept of the “validity” of a sacrament is ridiculous and incomprehensible. This lack of concern for validity bodes ill for the future of the Church. Such Catholics think (although thinking may be a generous term for what goes on in their minds) that anyone can administer any sacrament using any fashionable form and matter.  

The source of this is two fold: the total lack of doctrinal catechesis is for a generation, and the false catechesis that extreme informality and casualness in the liturgy gave. A 1992 Gallup poll seemed to indicate that Catholics had a more Zwinglian idea of the Eucharist than Lutheran did. Most Lutheran and Episcopal churches have a far more reverent celebration of the Eucharist than Catholic churches do – and the mode of celebration conveys a message.

 

Leave a Comment

Erotic Catholicism in Brazil

February 25, 2008 in Women in Church 1 Comment Tags: Brazil, Catholic Church, Marcelo Rossi, Sonda me

In Chapter Seven of my book The Church Impotent: The Feminization of Christianity (available on line at another part of this web site) I examine the strong streak of erotic mysticism in Catholicism, a streak that turns to turn men off. 

Kath.net has a brief article on Marcelo Rossi, a Brazilian priest who is a hit pop singer whose newest album just sold 1.3 million copies.

Here is a Rossi video Sonda me, Look at me.

Notice:

  • The music is romantic love music

  • 99% of the laity shown are women

  • The erotic atmosphere is unmistakable.

This is not to accuse Rossi of any misbehavior – he is simply using a strong and popular tradition in Catholic popular religion, but one that has unfortunate consequences in alienating men from the Church. 

Our Brazilian housekeeper came in while I was playing the video and expressed her undying devotion to Rossi. Her English is limited, and my Portuguese non-existent, but she was trying to express part of Rossi’s message about the body. I got the drift.

Leave a Comment

Why We Went to Patagonia

February 24, 2008 in Argentina, Patagonia 1 Comment

It really looks like this – except 100,000 times bigger!

Leave a Comment

A Summer Stroll in Patagonia

February 24, 2008 in Argentina, Hiking 1 Comment

Our boat delivers us to a rock island at the edge of the Viedma Glacier.

We cross the rock polished by the recently-retreated glacier.

We don our crampons.

We survey the summer landscape.

Our leader cuts steps to smooth our path.

We stroll carefree amid the summer breezes.

Charlie enjoys a refreshing cooling drink.

I laze in the summer sun.

And only one person, not even in our group, had to be taken back to the boat on a stretcher.

Leave a Comment

Cardinal Schönborn and the International Theological Institute

February 21, 2008 in Uncategorized No Comments

Gerald at the Cafeteria is Closed attended the dinner for the International Theological Institute in San Francisco (I went to the one in San Diego); Gerald gives excellent coverage of the current situation at ITI.

Leave a Comment
«< 66 67 68 69 70 >»

Subscribe


 

Categories

RECENT ENTRIES

  • The Hands That Restored Notre Dame
  • Misinformation c. 1900
  • The Spirits Among Us
  • (no title)
  • Jewish Safety in Europe, East and West
  • Unamuno and the Eternal Journey into God
  • Unamuno and Universal Salvation
  • Recovery
  • Elizabeth Lawrence Gilman
  • James H. Rutter

Blogroll

  • A Twitch Upon the Thread
  • Abuse Tracker
  • All Things Catholic
  • American Papist
  • Ampersand
  • Catholic and Enjoying It
  • Catholic Culture
  • Catholic Edition
  • Catholic Online
  • Christianity Today
  • Disputations
  • DotCommonweal
  • First Principles
  • First Things – On The Square
  • Front Porch Republic
  • GetReligion
  • InsideCatholic
  • Kath.net
  • Mere Comments
  • National Catholic Register
  • National Catholic Reporter
  • New Oxford Review
  • NovAntiqua
  • Patrick Madrid
  • Pontifications
  • Reditus a Chronicle of Aesthetic Christianity
  • Rod Dreher Crunchy Con
  • Ross Douthat
  • Stephenscom
  • The Catholic Thing
  • The Crossland Foundation
  • The Curious Gaze
  • Via Media
  • Whispers in the Loggia

Reviews and Comments of Podles' new book: SACRILEGE

  • Julia Duin, of The Washington Times, on Lee Podles’ Sacrilege
Leon J. Podles :: DIALOGUE
© Leon J. Podles :: DIALOGUE 2025
Powered by WordPress • Themify WordPress Themes

↑ Back to top