Leon J. Podles :: DIALOGUE
A Discussion of Faith, Family, and Culture
RSS
  • Home
  • Archives
  • About
  • Podles.org

Nothing New Under the Sun

April 15, 2009 in Liturgy, Uncategorized No Comments Tags: Liturgy

In 1912, a member of the Church and Religion Forward Movement complained that trained choirs were replacing congregational singing and were becoming a form of religious entertainment. He added 

What is worse than that is this: That in this tendency to aestheticism, we have brought within the pale of the church—may we blush for it—a kind of vaudeville. We have brought instrumentalities that have no rightful place there, that are a disgrace to the church. Thank God the time has come when a righteous public opinion has risen to smite this method of interpreting the dignity and the message and the glory of the Lord, Jesus Christ. We must away with these things. We must have within the church the things that are decent and well-ordered, whether they are interpreted through a beautiful liturgy or a dignified, extemporaneous service. 

Hear, hear! Because all too often I have to hear a celebrant who obviously missed his vocation as a Las Vegas night club host and musicians who couldn’t make it in the club scene.

Leave a Comment

The Passion of Mel Gibson

April 15, 2009 in Moral Theology 5 Comments Tags: Mel Gibson, rigidity

Mel Gibson’s wife has filed for divorce. His behavior over the years has been provoking both his alcoholism and his remarks that she would not be saved because she was an Anglican. Gibson himself belongs to a schismatic group so the latter remark was especially puzzling.

I have observed over the years that individuals and societies that are overly-rigid tend to self-destruct in a spectacular way. Individuals tend to adopt some ultra –rigid form of their religion. It is misleading to call this form fundamentalist or conservative, because one can conserve one’s beliefs and traditions and adhere to the fundamentals of one’s faith without being rigid.

I think that people become rigid because they fear the chaos that they sense in themselves, and adopt rigidity as a defense against it. I was told the story of one Anglo-Catholic priest who had screaming fits if an altar boy made a slight mistake in the ritual. The priest was obviously gay and was trying hard not to give in to his desires, and felt that the slightest deviation or laxity would lead to chaos.

Northeasterners have resented the implication that they are less moral than the Bible Belt. The Northeast has a low divorce rate; the Bible Belt has a high divorce rate. Northeasterners are much more tolerant of sex before marriage; teenagers in the Bible Belt disapprove of sex before mirage and run off to Gatlinburg for a quickie marriage, which is then followed by a divorce.

A stable society (or personality) can tolerate much more diversity than an unstable can.

The Northeast is much more stable (and also older and more female) than the Bible Belt, which upholds strict standards in a defense against the chaos of human passions.

Rigidity is often accompanied by brittleness, and leads to spectacular downfalls. Such downfalls are not the result of hypocrisy, but of an attempt to control chaos by rigid and unbending rules. Such an attempt doesn’t work very well; a person of inner virtue and strength and stability will not worry so much about minor things, but will trust himself to do the right thing in normal circumstances.

Leave a Comment

Another Reason to Hate Spam

April 14, 2009 in Uncategorized No Comments

Die Welt reports: 

Spam-Mails fressen so viel Strom wie Millionenstadt

Spam gobbles as much electricity as a city of millions

(2.4 million, to be exact, as the Germans like to be). Spam: Umweltschmutzer!

Leave a Comment

False Dawn

April 13, 2009 in demography, Germany 2 Comments Tags: birth rate, Germany

Misleading statistics indicated that Germany’s birth rate was rising because of new, generous government polices. But the statistics were misleading. Despite lavish benefits, the German birth rate continues to drop. Der Spiegel reports

On Tuesday, though, the German Federal Statistical Office released preliminary figures for all of 2008, and the news is not pretty. Rather than the heralded rise in births, 2008 saw a 1.1 percent drop in the birthrate — or 8,000 fewer children for a country already worried about its growing demographic crisis.

Allan Carlsson has observed that it is not possible for a government to buy children. At best government policies can encourage people to have children earlier, but polices will not increase the number of children.

Sectors of Germany, right and left, want to encourage women to enter and to stay in the work force. The number of working-age Germans is dropping rapidly. Business wants a larger work force to keep down wage demands, and therefore wants women in the work force. Egalitarians who want men and women to have identical life-patterns therefore want women in the work force. But it is hard to have a replacement birthrate when women have the pressure of a career.

Leave a Comment

Anastasis

April 12, 2009 in Uncategorized 1 Comment

Leave a Comment

Extreme Humility

April 10, 2009 in Icons 1 Comment

Today is hung upon the Tree, He who suspended the earth amid the waters.

A crown of thorns crowns Him, Who is the King of Angels.

He is wrapped in the purple of mockery, Who wrapped the heavens with clouds.

He is buffeted with blows, Who freed Adam in the Jordan.

He is transfixed with nails, Who is the Bridegroom of the Church.

He is pierced with a lance, Who is the Virgin’s Son.

We worship Your Passion, O Christ, Show us also Your glorious Resurrection.

Leave a Comment

Maundy Thursday

April 9, 2009 in clergy sex abuse scandal, Icons, Uncategorized 1 Comment Tags: Maundy Thursday

Ubi Caritas et amor, ibi Deus est

A new commandment (mandatum) I give to you, love one another, as I have loved you.

But the beloved disciple, reclining on Jesus’ breast, asked, who it was who would betray him. The one who dipped his hand in the dish with me is the one, Jesus answered. Judas took the morsel, in a demonic parody of the Eucharist, and instead of Jesus, the devil entered into him.

The deepest shadow falls over the instituion of the Eucharist: it is the seal of love and the occasion of betrayal. So I fear shall it shall ever be in the Church: Jesus will be betrayed by those whom he has chosen to be close to him.

Leave a Comment

Spy Wednesday

April 8, 2009 in Icons 1 Comment Tags: Judas, Spy Wednesday

Today is Spy Wednesday, because Judas was spying out an opportunity to betray Jesus, as he would do with a kiss.

I often wonder whether Judas thought Jesus would escape as he had before, no harm would have been done, and Judas would have been thirty silver pieces richer. When Judas realized that his plan was not working out and that he had inadvertently betrayed Jesus to his death, he was overcome with horror and killed himself. Perhaps.

Leave a Comment

The Followers of St. Death

April 7, 2009 in Mexico, Uncategorized 3 Comments Tags: Mexico, Santa Muerte, St. Death

Sometimes one wonders about absolute freedom of religion:

From CNA:

Father Hugo Valdemar, spokesman of the Archdiocese of Mexico City, warned this week about the “terrorist” nature of the call for a “holy war” against the Catholic Church by the leader of followers of “St. Death.”

David Romo Guillen, leader of the devotion to “St. Death,” especially popular among drug traffickers and criminals, called for a “holy war” against the Catholic Church after the Mexican Army destroyed several places of worship it suspected to be criminal hideouts, especially in the northern part of the country.

“Only terrorist or fundamentalist leaders call for holy wars, like Bin Laden or the Taliban. It’s a shame that Mr. Romo makes himself equal to the Taliban or a terrorist by calling for a holy war,” said Father Valdemar. After the destruction of the suspected hideouts, Romo blamed the military’s actions on the Catholic Church, because several bishops had warned against the devotion and called it un-Christian.

This Monday, the followers of St. Death, led by David Romo, protested outside the Cathedral of Mexico City, bearing pictures of the “White Child,” the name they have given to St. Death, represented by a skeleton dressed in a white tunic or sometimes in a wedding gown.

Leave a Comment

Dominica in Ramis Palmarum

April 5, 2009 in Icons No Comments

Notice the hats on the right. Jews were required to wear these during the fourteenth century.

Leave a Comment

Further Thoughts on Catholic Laxity

April 4, 2009 in abortion, Moral Theology 5 Comments Tags: Catholic laxity, Gallup poll

The Gallup poll I cited below is puzzling. Why should Church regularly-Church-going Catholics be laxer in their attitudes to morality than regularly-Church-going Protestants?

The Church regards Tradition as the source of revelation. Tradition is That Which is Handed Over, tradere, and includes Scripture. Scripture is part of the life of the Church, and is to be understood as the Church understands it. I think even Protestants would see the logic of this view of Tradition, although they would place greater emphasis than Catholics do on Scripture as the norm of faith.

When moral questions arise, a Catholic should consult revelation, as interpreted by the magisterium. But what is the magisterium? Some regard it as the pope and the bishops who are in union with him. Others would include theologians. Before Vatican II, there were few disagreements about moral question in the Church, usually on rare cases.

In practice Catholics did not consult Pope, bishops, or theologians, but the prelist in their parish or what they read in Catholic publications. Again, before Vatican II there were few disagreements about morality. Anyone in the clergy would give basically the same answer to a question about morality. There were minor differences, and Catholics were taught you could follow any reputable opinion if there were differences. These usually concerned disciplinary questions, such as the requirements of fasting.

But after Vatican II total chaos ensued. The Catholic Theologian Society issued a book that could not bring itself to condemn any sexual practice including adultery and swinging. André Guindon, who taught in a seminary and wrote a book extensively used in catholic seminaries, claimed that the main problem with pedophilia was the fuss the parents made (all discussed at length in my book).

Especially in the area of sexuality, a Catholic during the past 40 years could find a priest who would countenance or even advocate any imaginable (and many unimaginable) sexual practice. With this multitude of voices, Catholic, being human beings who are therefore adverse to curbs on appetite, chose to follow the voices promoting laxity, with the results that the poll shows.

Protestants, more accustomed to consulting Scripture directly, did not undergo this revolution. Although liberal Protestant theologians attempted to undermine the moral teachings of Scripture, they had to deal with the unchanging words on the page, which still carry divine authority for many Protestants.

Leave a Comment

Resisting the Call of the World

April 2, 2009 in abortion, education, Moral Theology, Secularism 8 Comments Tags: Catholics, Gallup poll, morality, Protestants

The Gallup Poll, as Bill Cork pointed out, has revealed that Church-going Catholics are far more likely that Church-going non-Catholics (almost all Protestant) to accept immoral behavior.

I do not find this surprising. Other polls I have seen over the years reveal similar patterns.

This data helps explain Notre Dame’s invitation to Obama. Many Catholics accept Obama’s positions.

Why?

The failure of catechesis over the past two generations is one of the principal reasons. Making felt banners does not help produce a reverence for God and the moral law. Catechesis may have improved in the schools, but fewer Catholic children are going to Catholics schools or to religious education classes. Instead they are picking up their attitudes from their poorly-catechized parents, among whom are prominent politicians.

But this still does not fully explain the difference. Why are Church-going Protestants better able to resist accepting prevalent secular attitudes to morality? Catholics once submitted to the teaching authority of the Church; many Catholics, even those who regularly attend church, have clearly rejected that, and have nothing to replace it except the standards of American society. Perhaps Protestantism, built upon a veneration of the Bible, has been better able to resist the moral acids of secularism. Catholics claim that the living authority of the magisterium is better able to meet moral challenges, but this does not in fact seem to be the case. Roma locuta est, but very few Catholics are listening. When the Bible speaks, (and it does speak clearly on many issues) many Protestants listen.

Leave a Comment

Lace Curtain Catholics and the Moral Law

April 2, 2009 in abortion, guilt, Medical ethics, Moral Theology, Responsibility, Voluntarism 2 Comments Tags: moral law, Notre Dame, Obama, social climbing

Notre Dame did not anticipate the level of criticism it is getting for its invitation to Obama, criticism not only from grass-root pro-life activists, but also from bishops and cardinals. Those who defend the invitation have been rather lame. They claim that the invitation does not show an approval of Obama’s positions on life; this may be true, but it certainly shows that Notre Dame does not regard Obama’s positions as beyond the pale. Notre Dame would never have invited George Wallace as a commencement speaker. Obama knows very well that his presence at Notre Dame is a political plus, demonstrating that the leading Catholic university in the U. S. finds his positions at least tolerable, even as he dismantles conscience protections for health workers – many of them Catholic – who object to being involved in abortions.

Notre Dame claims that the invitation is an opening to dialogue. But a commencement speech is not a debate. A debate would have been a wonderful idea, and Obama would never have accepted it. It would have been political poison.

But the primary defense is that Obama’s visit will acknowledge Notre Dame’s importance. Over at the dotCommoweal site, Margeret Steinfels and others do not want the Catholic Church to become a sect, a ghetto, marginalized. The proffering of the invitation to Obama and the joy at its acceptance were a sign of social status insecurity. Would Harvard have squealed for glee if the President accepted an invitation to speak, or Oxford if the Prime Minister came, or the Sorbonne if Sarkozy came? No. These universities rightfully regard mere politicians as beneath them in status.

Evelyn Waugh described the Catholic Church in America as a tribal institution of the Irish, and much of its strength lay in its helping immigrants establish themselves in America. The church was an instrument of social climbing. The process continues: everything that keeps back advancement in society is abolished, ignored, or downgraded.

Both sides of the Obama controversy, however, demonstrate a Catholic tendency that does no good to the Church: the tendency to see everything in terms of will and obedience, that is, in the context of a voluntaristic approach to morality. Attempts to find a way in canon law to block the invitation are one sign of this attitude; but the defenses of Obama also demonstrate the influence of voluntarism.

The defense runs as such: Obama does not share Catholic beliefs about protecting human life; therefore he is not doing anything wrong when he advances abortion and experimentation on human embryos. We should therefore respect his conscience.

In one of his books, Cardinal Ratzinger showed the fallacy of this. He recounts a conversation with an unnamed theologian (I suspect Hans Küng) about conscience. The theologian said it was well that Europeans had an invincible ignorance about sexual morality. If they accepted Christian teaching they would still fornicate and commit adultery, but as it was they now did these actions without guilt, because they were acting according to their consciences.

Ratzinger asked if the same principle applied to the SS men who killed Jews because they thought they were doing a good act in cleansing Europe of a Jewish poison. The theologian replied. Yes, the SS men were acting in good conscience and were guiltless. Ratzinger thought there was something very wrong with this approach.

Briefly, the position of Ratzinger (and of Aquinas and the Fathers) is that God commands or forbids things through a promulgated moral law because those things are good or bad in themselves. Even if one acts in ignorance of the moral law, one does evil, even if it without the guilt of a conscious transgression of a promulgated law. As the Psalmist prays: From my unknown faults deliver me, O Lord.

Leave a Comment

US vs. EU

April 1, 2009 in demography No Comments Tags: Demographics, Merkel, Rogoff

European leaders do not seem to care for Obama’s policies any more than they cared for Bush’s, at least when it comes to economic policy.

Obama wants to borrow and spend to stimulate the economy; Europeans are very reluctant to do so. The demographic situations of the two continents are different

Kenneth Rogoff, the former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund, said

Ultimately the debts must be repaid, and many European countries already are facing grim fiscal calculations between the prospective costs of bailing out their own financial system (as well as weaker states in Europe), together with adverse demographics.

Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany explained:

It is not, she pointed out, simply a philosophical difference. Borrow and spend today, repay down the road, is a particularly difficult proposition for a country with a shrinking population, she said.

“Over the next decade we will undergo a massive demographic change, and, therefore, borrowing is a greater burden for the future than in a country with a much more continuously growing population, as in the United States of America,” Mrs. Merkel said.

It might make sense in the U.S. to borrow now and pay later, because the number of taxpayers keeps growing. It is falling in Europe, and the decline will speed up. Workers are retiring, and there are few children to replace them.

Leave a Comment

A Short Demography Lesson

April 1, 2009 in demography 2 Comments Tags: birth rates, demography, population decline

Birthrates continue to fall all over the world; in Europe they are well below the replacement level. There has been so much population bomb propaganda over the past generation that many people regard this as a good development. Yglesias (tip to Ross Douthat) writes

Less clear to me is why so many people seem concerned by the specter of low birth rates. Historically, low levels of population are associated with high average living standards. That should be less true in the modern world where we’re not as dependent on agriculture for our economic activity. But the logic hasn’t completely vanished. If there were dramatically fewer people in the United States it would be much more realistic for us to all be eating free-range organic grass-fed beef. And even amidst a real estate bust, the country is far too crowded for a middle class family to afford a spacious residence in the most desirable markets such as San Francisco or Manhattan.

There are two inescapable problems with a declining birthrate:

The infrastructure of a city or country is built for a certain population. As the population falls, the infrastructure is too big. In Eastern Germany, sewer systems have stopped function because there is not enough use; rail lines are being abandoned, whole neighborhoods demolished, factories are unneeded, etc.

More importantly, a declining birthrate change s the age structure of a population. The Black Death killed people of all age levels and did not change the age structure of a society; a low birth rate means a rapidly declining AND aging population. A one child birthrate means that hour grandparents are followed by two children and one grandchild. The smaller childhood non-working population is outnumbered by the elderly non-working population. Already in Hungary four million workers support three million pensioners. Whether by private or public means, the retired generation is supported by the working age population, which will shrink and shrink. The cost of supporting retirees will further discourage the working-age population for having children, and the downward spiral reinforces itself.

These are the inescapable problems. There can be other problems depending on historical circumstances. When there are differential birthrates in a society, when one group is out-reproducing the other, severe problems can result. Lebanon was torn apart by war when the Muslim population became the majority because the Christian population, influenced by the French, had smaller families. Israel faces a majority-Arab population because the Arabs have more children than Jews do; and in many European cities Moslem children area already the majority of the school-age population. The Serbs lost Kosovo to the ethnic Albanians because the Albanians had children and the Serbs did not; ethnic Slovakians face a near future in which Gypsies may be the majority, for the same reason.

Leave a Comment
«< 60 61 62 63 64 >»

Subscribe


 

Categories

RECENT ENTRIES

  • The Hands That Restored Notre Dame
  • Misinformation c. 1900
  • The Spirits Among Us
  • (no title)
  • Jewish Safety in Europe, East and West
  • Unamuno and the Eternal Journey into God
  • Unamuno and Universal Salvation
  • Recovery
  • Elizabeth Lawrence Gilman
  • James H. Rutter

Blogroll

  • A Twitch Upon the Thread
  • Abuse Tracker
  • All Things Catholic
  • American Papist
  • Ampersand
  • Catholic and Enjoying It
  • Catholic Culture
  • Catholic Edition
  • Catholic Online
  • Christianity Today
  • Disputations
  • DotCommonweal
  • First Principles
  • First Things – On The Square
  • Front Porch Republic
  • GetReligion
  • InsideCatholic
  • Kath.net
  • Mere Comments
  • National Catholic Register
  • National Catholic Reporter
  • New Oxford Review
  • NovAntiqua
  • Patrick Madrid
  • Pontifications
  • Reditus a Chronicle of Aesthetic Christianity
  • Rod Dreher Crunchy Con
  • Ross Douthat
  • Stephenscom
  • The Catholic Thing
  • The Crossland Foundation
  • The Curious Gaze
  • Via Media
  • Whispers in the Loggia

Reviews and Comments of Podles' new book: SACRILEGE

  • Julia Duin, of The Washington Times, on Lee Podles’ Sacrilege
Leon J. Podles :: DIALOGUE
© Leon J. Podles :: DIALOGUE 2025
Powered by WordPress • Themify WordPress Themes

↑ Back to top