Leon J. Podles :: DIALOGUE
A Discussion of Faith, Family, and Culture
RSS
  • Home
  • Archives
  • About
  • Podles.org

Maciel: Equal Opportunity Abuser

February 7, 2009 in clergy sex abuse scandal 14 Comments Tags: abuse, Juan Vaca, Legion. suppresision, Maciel

According to El Sendero de Peje, Juan Vaca, a former Legionary who has supplied much of the details of Maciel’s abuse of boys, reports that the mother of the daughter whose existence the Legion admits was 15 years old when Maciel, then age 68, got her pregnant. Maciel always knew of the existence of his daughter.

The daughter is now 20 years old, and wants to sell her story. That has forced the Legion to make its vague public admissions – why they have been so vague is now clear. The current head of the Legion has known about this daughter for 5 years and confronted Maciel about the $10-15 thousand Maciel had taken on his trips.

If all this is true, and Vaca has been a reliable source, I see no alternative to the suppression of the Legion. The Piarists were suppressed in the 17th century for similar reasons; the Jesuits were suppressed for political reasons; various branches of the Franciscans were suppressed for nuttiness. The priests can go to dioceses and other orders; the schools and other apostolates can be run as separate foundations; but the Legion must cease to exist.

Leave a Comment

Whom to Trust?

February 4, 2009 in clergy sex abuse scandal, Uncategorized 6 Comments Tags: con artis, Legion of Chist, Maciel, Medjugorje, Society of St. John

We have been warned about false Messiahs. As ordinary laity we must to some extent rely on the judgment of those most responsible for the Church, that is, the clergy. They have the time to investigate matters.

When I first heard of Medjugorje, I relied upon the Rev. Rene Laurentin’s favorable judgment. He was a sane, balanced theologian and was favorable to Medjugorje. I followed the requests for prayer and fasting (good in themselves). But Laurentin ignored or misrepresented evidence that the whole phenomenon was tainted by fraud, and even pious fraud discredits religion.

I had no direct contact with the Legion of Christ, but I had a favorable impression of them, and made a substantial contribution to their school in Naples, Florida (which had its own problems with another con artist). After the initial accusations against Maciel came out, I relied upon Neuhaus’s judgment. He assured everyone that he had read all documents about the case and he was morally certain that Maciel was innocent. But the evidence began to pile up. I helped Jason Berry produce his documentary Vows of Silence. I at first asked him to give at least another side of the question. He, wisely, refused. Benedict XVI showed by his actions that he agreed with Jason that Maciel was corrupt.

I was tracked down by the Society of St. John; they claimed they liked my first book, The Church Impotent: The Feminization of Christianity. They assured me they were trying to form masculine seminarians. I checked with the bishop of Scranton, who assured me that they were entirely on the up and up. It turned out not to be so. God knows what depravity my donation helped pay for.

When authorities in the Church fail to carry out their important role in discerning the spirits, they leave the laity in a quandary. Whom can we trust? If we encourage our children to go to confession, will they be seduced in the confessional? If we encourage a religious or priestly vocation will they be seduced in the monastery or seminary? If we give money to a parish will it be stolen by the pastor to finance his male or female lovers? Our shepherds seem to care little for protecting us from such wolves.

The divisions in the Church, although painful, can perhaps serve a useful purpose. No one would think that John Allen is conservative, and therefore his generally favorable evaluation of Opus Dei carries far more weight that papal approbation would. But reporters cannot replace bishops, the appointed overseers of the Church, and I wish more of them would spend less time on fund raising and career advancement and more on protecting the sheep.

Leave a Comment

Maciel: The Catholic Bernie Madoff

February 4, 2009 in clergy sex abuse scandal 11 Comments Tags: charlatan, Legion, Maciel, scandal

The Legion of Christ is apparently admitting that its founder, Marcial Maciel, led a double life and fathered a child by his mistress. They have not admitted the truth of the accusations of sexual abuse of boys that led Benedict XVI to discipline Maciel.

I have nothing personal against the Legion, but I wonder why so many wealthy, intelligent people abandon all prudence when dealing with the Legion. Why are these people so naïve?

John Paul II must bear much of the responsibility Pius XII had deep suspicions about Maciel and it seems that Pius XII was about to remove Maciel but the Pope’s death stopped the process, and in the interregnum a friend of Maciel made sure he was in good standing before John XXIII was elected.

But John Paul II refused to conduct a thorough investigation about Maciel, despite the numerous accusations, and Cardinal Ratzinger was obviously frustrated and angry because he was unable to act against an abuser. When of the first acts of Benedict XVI was to discipline Maciel.

The founders of religious orders were imperfect men (and women). Ignatius had a temper tantrum a few days before his death, and I have heard that St Jose Maria Escriva, founder of Opus Dei, was known and feared for his temper.

Maciel was not simply imperfect but was duplicitous. No founder of a religious order was ever guilty of such crimes. The closest parallel was Joseph Calasanctius, founder of the Piarists. Himself an austere man, Calasanctius covered up sexual abuse by Stephano Cherubini because the new order needed the support of the influential Cherubini family. Calasanctius retired, and lived to see his order taken over by the abuser and collapse in rebellion against this corruption. Karen Liebreich iscovered this story in the documents of the Inquisition, and recounted it in Fallen Order: Intrigue, Heresy, and Scandal in the Rome of Galileo and Caravaggio.

A Jewish acquaintance explained to me why such charismatic, narcissistic scoundrels succeed: people are always looking for the Messiah, and will not wait until he comes, but will willingly fall under the spell of a false Messiah. I think that someone else has warned us about this.

Leave a Comment

Benedict XVI on the Crimes of the Past

January 31, 2009 in Anti-Semitism, clergy sex abuse scandal, Vatican No Comments Tags: Anti-Semitism, Benedict XVI, past crimes

The efforts of victims (and now of a U.S. attorney) to make bishops accountable is often derided as bringing up ancient history (i.e., 1970) or criticized as demonstrating a failure to carryout the great biblical principle of forgive and forget (I have never been able to locate that verse).

Of the Holocaust, Benedict said:

Das Vergangene ist nie bloß vergangen. Es geht uns an und zeigt uns, welche Wege wir nicht gehen dürfen und welche wir suchen müssen.

The past is never really gone. It’s our business and it shows us the way we should not follow and the way we should seek.

Leave a Comment

Cardinals and the Law

January 30, 2009 in clergy sex abuse scandal 1 Comment Tags: Cardinal Mahoney, honest services, law, Thomas O'Brien

>

U.S. Attorney Thomas O’Brien is known for novel applications of law in going after outrageous behavior. He is trying to nail Cardinal Mahoney on grounds of fraud for failing to provide honest services. It will be a difficult case. Although actions of Mahoney reek of perjury, being an accessory before the act and after the act to felony, conspiracy, obstruction of justice, he is slippery enough to escape indictment, since these charges are hard to prove.

Cardinal Mahoney, along with many bishops, did something morally wrong in inflicting known abusers on unsuspecting parishes. The problem is whether they did anything illegal. Law are made to cover only crimes that people probably commit. As an extreme example, a German helped someone commit suicide and then ate part of his body. The German courts discovered there is no law against cannibalism in Germany – no one ever thought to pass one. Similarly, no one ever thought to make it a crime to put known pedophiles in parishes with access to children, because no one thought anyone would be so depraved and hard-hearted as to do that. Our lawmakers were insufficiently acquainted with Catholic bishops.

Leave a Comment

The Death of Children

January 28, 2009 in death, Uncategorized No Comments Tags: death of children, prayer for dead

The Theotokos, Joy of All Who Sorrow

 

The son of a friend of mine died after a long struggle with childhood leukemia.

I awoke in the middle of the night, went to my bookcase, and found a book of Akathists. I read the Akathist for the Repose of the Departed.

It includes these prayers and reflections:

Enlightened by the illumination of the All-highest, Saint Macarius heard a voice from a pagan skull: When you pray for those suffering in Hades, then there is comfort for the heathen. O wondrous power of Christian prayer, by which even the nether regions are illumined! Both believers and unbelievers receive consolation when we cry for the whole world: Alleluia!

and

The words of Isaac the Syrian are recalled: the heart of the merciful offers prayers with tears every hour for people and animals and all creation, that they may be preserved and purified.

and

We are to blame for the calamities in the world, for the sufferings of dumb creatures and for the diseases and torments of blameless children, for through the fall of man the beatitude and beauty of all creation have been marred.

O Lord of unutterable love, remember Thy servants who have fallen asleep!

Leave a Comment

Traditionalists Disown Holocaust-Denier Bishop

January 27, 2009 in Anti-Semitism 1 Comment Tags: Holocaust denier, SSPX, Wlliamsson

Kathnet reports:

 

“The Society of Pius X on Tuesday for the first time clearly distanced itself from controversial Holocaust-denier Bishop Williamson, a member of the Society.”

 

Bishop Bernard Fellay, the head of the Society, said that he has become aware of the interview and “that it was obvious that a bishop speaks with religious authority only in matters of faith and morals.” The Society “asks for forgiveness from the Holy Father and from all men of good will for the distress that has been brought about. It must be clear that these opinions in no way represent the position of our Society. Therefore I have forbidden Bishop Williamson from making any further statements of political or historical questions.”

Leave a Comment

More Hazards of Florida Life

January 24, 2009 in Uncategorized No Comments

Northeasterners whose main concern about wildlife is that deer are eating their azaleas are often unprepared for living in Florida. Our local newspaper’s articles often remind me of Huxley’s essay, “Wordsworth in the Tropics.”

Wildlife officials say two men putting up a fence in Martin County on Florida’s east coast fended off and killed a 30-pound bobcat with a hammer.

The two men were working on a ranch when the bobcat attacked. One of the men hit the bobcat with a hammer and was able to get it off the other. Florida Fish and Wildlife spokeswoman Gabriella Ferraro says one of the men was treated at a hospital for scratches to his chest and bite marks to his shoulder. The other man was not injured.

Leave a Comment

Guilt and Responsibility

January 22, 2009 in abortion, guilt, Responsibility, Uncategorized No Comments Tags: abortion, guilt, Responsibility, Serbia

In Der Spiegel, Slavenka Draculic, a Croatian, writes of why she cannot visit Belgrade: 

Why had I not visited for all of these years?

Was it about “them”? About what “they” did to “us”? Or about what Serbs did to themselves? If I traveled there I would carry two decades of images and emotions with me, like that of the Muslim woman from Srebrenica whose son was murdered by the Serbs. Her words, “I was forced to drink the blood of my own son,” are burned in my memory. So too is the photo of a young man bent forward over a railing with a gaping hole in his chest. How strange, I thought when I saw it, that you could see the railing through the hole.

The young citizens of Serbia were born after the war but cannot visit other countries without a visa, unlike during the time if Yugoslavia.

Today young Serbs are isolated and prohibited from seeing the world, and they are angry about it. At a recent conference, I heard a young Serbian man speak passionately about the fact that his generation was not even born when the wars broke out. They are not responsible for the crimes of their fathers. Because they are young, he implied, they are blameless. I must admit that this presumed innocence does not feel right to me.

The young still bear responsibility:

I wonder how much the new generation in Serbia knows about its own past. Like ours, their generation is responsible for its silence, for not asking about what happened before they were born, for not caring about what their fathers did during those wars, for believing that they have the right to visas just because they are young and their hands are clean. Most of all, they are responsible for failing to ask their parents why they are deprived of visas. The youngest generation of Serbs cannot be held responsible for the past. But all of them are responsible for their present attitude toward the past. That was the lesson that we, their parents’ generation, had to learn the hard way.

Silence is complicity.

We cannot repeat our mistakes and the mistakes of our parents. We all have to confront the past. The new postwar generation has its own responsibility: it must seek the truth. The youth of Serbia suffer because they are not asking questions.

This, I believe, is why I don’t visit Belgrade. I couldn’t bear the silence.

Today January 22 is the anniversary of Roe v. Wade.

 

Leave a Comment

Double Standard for Roman Polanski

January 17, 2009 in clergy sex abuse scandal, sexual abuse, Uncategorized No Comments Tags: child molester, Polanski

One of the few legitimate complaints about the way the press has handled the clericals sex abuse accusations is that there is a double standard for clerical and non-clerical abusers.

Roman Polanski fled the United States after being accused of having intercourse with a 13-year-old girl. He admitted the act, but said he didn’t know she was only 13. He has never returned to the U.S., but has had a successful career and received an Oscar in 2002 for The Pianist.

He wants his case to be heard in absentia, according to the AP. The victim wants him to appear before the court, and the court has refused to have a trial when he has fled justice and it has no control over his person.

The prosecutor David Walgren explained:

Walgren said little has changed legally since the day in 1978 when Polanski failed to appear in a Santa Monica courtroom for sentencing.

“The defendant ignored a lawful and valid court order to appear in court and instead chose to flee to the comforts of France,” he said.

“It would be a farce for this court to review the case when it has no jurisdiction over the defendant,” the prosecutor said.

Walgren argued that allowing such a hearing would violate the basic principle of the fugitive disentitlement doctrine, that “a fugitive from justice has no right to ask the court to review the very judgment that the fugitive flouts.”

As for the victim’s right to speak, Walgren concluded: “Until such time that the defendant submits to this court’s jurisdiction and the court holds a hearing, the time is not ripe for the victim, either personally or through her attorney, to be heard in court.”

There is no outcry that the arts community has honored an admitted child-molester.

Leave a Comment

Catholics and Anti-Semites Together

January 16, 2009 in Anti-Semitism, Canada No Comments Tags: ant-semitism, Catholic Church, Montreal

Although Israel’s – and Hamas’s – actions are subject to moral scrutiny, the demonstrations that occurred when Hamas was firing thousands of rockets into Israel were invisible – because they didn’t occur.

Nor do critics of Hamas associate with racist ant-Arabs, mostly because there aren’t any.

But Catholics and others feel no taint in joining with anti-Semites in protests against Israel. The Montréal Gazette observes:

By their nature, political demonstrations cast a wide net. Whatever the subject, loose affiliations of like-minded organizations often serve as contact networks in efforts to maximize attendance.

So it was at last Saturday’s Montreal “manif,” one in a series denouncing Israel’s military action in Gaza. More than 20 organizations were involved, from Quebec’s biggest union groups to the Fédération des femmes and the social action office of the Catholic archdiocese of Montreal, plus Québec solidaire and even something called the Mouvement Québécois pour une décroissance conviviale.

None of those groups, we’ll presume, had members involved in some of the chanting during the protest. “Burn, burn Israel” and “Palestine is ours, the Jews are our dogs” and “There is no god but Allah, and the jihadist is beloved of Allah” are not sentiments associated with the archdiocese, nor the women’s group.

And yet there they were, all in the same rally. We have heard nobody from any of those important organizations denounce the open hatred and anti-Semitism displayed by some of their fellow marchers, and we can’t understand why not.

Such a failure leads to the suspicion that anti-Israeli sentiment is in fact anti-Semitism.

Leave a Comment

Dhimmitude in Germany

January 13, 2009 in Anti-Semitism, Germany, Islam No Comments Tags: Anti-Semitism, Duisberg, Germany

German police tore down an Israeli flag because it offended Moslem protestors. When will Germans start arresting Jews and ah, “disposing” of them so that Moslems won’t tear Germany apart? Der Spiegel reports: 

Police in the western German city of Duisburg have admitted they removed flags a student had hung in his apartment in support of Israel during a pro-Palestinian protest march in the city. Officers broke down his door and removed the flags. The city’s police chief has issued an apology, but outrage is spreading. 

A student had hung Israel flags in his apartment window. He was outside watching the anti-Israeli demonstration. 

“Suddenly,” the student explained, “I saw a police officer on the balcony on the second floor” in the apartment located directly beneath his. The officer ripped down the Israeli flag that had been affixed to P.’s balcony. A short time later he witnessed an officer inside his own apartment taking down the flag that had been hung in the bedroom. 

To see the Moslem youths applauding the police tearing down the Israeli flag see YouTube.

The police defended their action: 

Initially, Duisburg police defended their actions. In its Monday issue, the Westdeutsche Allgemeine Zeitung newspaper quoted a police spokesperson stating that the flags had been removed in order to de-escalate a potentially dangerous situation. German news agency DDP quoted the spokesperson on Tuesday saying “the right thing had been done here.” 

And the student is afraid to use his apartment, because the police destroyed the door.

On Tuesday, Peter P. said he had obtained the services of a lawyer. He still hasn’t been told who will be held responsible for paying for the door broken down by police. 

A small rehearsal for a future Kristallnacht? Italian socialists want to identify all Jewish-owned shops so people can boycott them. The Germans perhaps can supply old Stars of David from war surplus.

 

Leave a Comment

Who Would Jesus Smack Down?

January 11, 2009 in Masculinity, Women in Church No Comments Tags: Calvinism, Mark Driscoll, Masculinity

The NYT article on the Calvinist and ultra-masculine Mark Driscoll at Mars Hill Church in Seattle is not too bad. Driscoll, by rejecting the prissiness of much of evangelical America, has some success in reaching rough young men with the gospel.

 

The theological analysis in the article uses stereotypes. Calvinists believe in total depravity – but so do Catholics. Calvin did not think that human nature was totally corrupt – because insofar as it is created by God, it is still good. Calvin knew his theology well enough not to be a Manichean. What Calvin thought was that all human powers, including reason, had been corrupted by sin, and Catholics believe that the will was weakened and the intellect was darkened by original sin.

 

Calvin’s doctrine of predestination and the role of the human will is also misunderstood. In Jonathan Edward’s excellent explanation, Calvin (along with Thomists) thought that God was the cause of every human action – including sin, insofar as it was an action and had being. Evil is the deprivation of being, and does not exist, and is therefore not caused by God. This analysis is a necessary corollary of the belief that God is the maker of heaven and earth, of everything, including, in a sense, sinful actions, and therefore of salvation and damnation.

 

Edwards identified the dissenters from this as Arminians and behind them the Jesuits, who both believed in the freedom of indifference. Edwards does not go further back to Occam and Scotus, but I think that their nominalism and voluntarism is the original Western source of the freedom of indifference.

 

During the controversy De Auxiliis, the Jesuits accused the Dominicans of Calvinism, and the Dominicans accused the Jesuits of Pelegianism. The pope resolved the matter by telling them both to stop accusing each other of heresy

Leave a Comment

News: Cardinal Schönborn is Catholic

January 10, 2009 in Austria, Population, Uncategorized No Comments Tags: Austria, depopulation, Schoenborn

Herbert Lackner writing in the Austrian newsmagazine Profil is shocked, shocked, to discover that Cardinal Schönborn is Catholic and supports the teachings of the papacy (whose current occupant happens to be his professor at Regensburg and I believe his dissertation director). 

 

In March 2008 he spoke to priests of the neocatechumate.  

 

His theme: the fall of the birth rate in Europe. Schönborn described three reasons for this: the abortion law that was liberalized in the 1970s, the increasing tendency to government recognition of homosexual partnerships, and contraception. In regard to the last themes Schönborn made his predecessors responsible: it as a sin that the Austrian bishops’ conference in 1968 in the Mariatroster Explanation said a strong No to the anti-pill encyclical of Pope Paul Vi. One did not have the courage to say Yes. 

Sein Thema: der Rückgang der Geburtenraten in Europa. Drei Gründe machte Schönborn dafür aus: die in den siebziger Jahren liberalisierten Abtreibungsgesetze, die zunehmende Tendenz zur staatlichen Anerkennung von homosexuellen Partnerschaften und die Empfängnisverhütung. Beim letzten Thema machte Schönborn auch seine Vorgänger mitverantwortlich: Es sei eine „Sünde“ gewesen, dass die österreichische Bischofskonferenz 1968 in der so genannten „Mariatroster Erklärung“ „Nein“ zur strengen Antibabypillen-Enzyklika von Papst Paul VI. gesagt habe. Man habe „nicht den Yes.Mut gehabt, Ja zu sagen“. 

Schönborn had to backtrack on his criticism of the bishops, but it seems undeniable that the acceptance of abortion and contraception by Austrian Catholics has led to a catastophic decline in the birth rate (I doubt that hosmoexuality is a cause of the decline).

 

Young Austrians are more anti-immigrant than older Austrians, according to Carl Djerassi („Warum wir bald sehr alt ausschauen,“ Der Standard, December 13, 2008) one of the inventors of the pill, but young Austrians don’t want to have children. Something has to give.

Leave a Comment

An Aging World

January 4, 2009 in Population No Comments Tags: demography, depopulation

The facts of demographic decline are starting to sink in. The working age population is already declining in some countries, according to a column in the Washington Post: 

Aging is, well, old. But depopulation — the delayed result of falling birthrates — is new. The working-age population has already begun to decline in several large developed countries, including Germany and Japan. By 2030, it will be declining in nearly all of them, and in a growing number, total population will be in steep decline as well. The arithmetic is simple: When the average couple has only 1.3 children (in Spain) or 1.7 children (in Britain), depopulation is inevitable, unless there’s massive immigration. 

Even poorer countries like China and Cuba are facing a upresebdent decline in working populations.

 

The exception is, as usual, the United States: 

An important but limited exception to hyperaging is the United States. Yes, America is also graying, but to a lesser extent. We are the only developed nation with replacement-rate fertility (2.1 children per couple). By 2030, our median age, now 36, will rise to only 39. Our working-age population, according to both U.N. and census projections, will continue to grow throughout the 21st century because of our higher fertility rate and substantial immigration — which we assimilate better than most other developed countries. By 2015, for the first time ever, the majority of developed-world citizens will live in English-speaking countries. 

The relative population dynamism and its high level of religious practice seem to be connected, but the question is what comes first. Do religious people have more children because they trust Providence, or does having children make parents face the mysteries of life and of death?

Leave a Comment
«< 63 64 65 66 67 >»

Subscribe


 

Categories

RECENT ENTRIES

  • The Hands That Restored Notre Dame
  • Misinformation c. 1900
  • The Spirits Among Us
  • (no title)
  • Jewish Safety in Europe, East and West
  • Unamuno and the Eternal Journey into God
  • Unamuno and Universal Salvation
  • Recovery
  • Elizabeth Lawrence Gilman
  • James H. Rutter

Blogroll

  • A Twitch Upon the Thread
  • Abuse Tracker
  • All Things Catholic
  • American Papist
  • Ampersand
  • Catholic and Enjoying It
  • Catholic Culture
  • Catholic Edition
  • Catholic Online
  • Christianity Today
  • Disputations
  • DotCommonweal
  • First Principles
  • First Things – On The Square
  • Front Porch Republic
  • GetReligion
  • InsideCatholic
  • Kath.net
  • Mere Comments
  • National Catholic Register
  • National Catholic Reporter
  • New Oxford Review
  • NovAntiqua
  • Patrick Madrid
  • Pontifications
  • Reditus a Chronicle of Aesthetic Christianity
  • Rod Dreher Crunchy Con
  • Ross Douthat
  • Stephenscom
  • The Catholic Thing
  • The Crossland Foundation
  • The Curious Gaze
  • Via Media
  • Whispers in the Loggia

Reviews and Comments of Podles' new book: SACRILEGE

  • Julia Duin, of The Washington Times, on Lee Podles’ Sacrilege
Leon J. Podles :: DIALOGUE
© Leon J. Podles :: DIALOGUE 2025
Powered by WordPress • Themify WordPress Themes

↑ Back to top