Leon J. Podles :: DIALOGUE
A Discussion of Faith, Family, and Culture
RSS
  • Home
  • Archives
  • About
  • Podles.org

Effingham Lawrence the Druggist

February 12, 2015 in Lawrence Family No Comments Tags: Effingham Lawrence, Genealogy, pharmaceuticals, Quakers

This Effingham Lawrence (June 6, 1760-December 13, 1800) was the son of Ann Burling and John Lawrence and my wife’s fourth great grand uncle. He married Elizabeth Watson (1764-1852) and had several children, including a Watson Effingham and an Effingham Watson (the lure of the name was irresistible).

Like many young male Quakers, Effingham succumbed to the allure of the Revolution, and was disowned by the Friends for wearing a cocked hat and sword.

In 1781 Effingham established his druggist’s business at 99 Pearl Street. He was the druggist and apothecary to the Medical Society, a committee of which examined his store quarterly and “certified that his drugs were genuine and his medicines faithfully prepared.” He was one of the sponsors of the Tontine Coffee House, and was the only sponsor listed as a “gentleman.”

In 1790 Thomas Jefferson returned from France. During his New York stay, he patronized several of the shops run by my wife’s relatives. In July 1790 Jefferson paid Effingham Lawrence, a druggist at 227 Queen Street [Pearl Street], for red bark and toothbrushes.

Toothbrush 18th C

An eighteenth-century toothbrush

Toothbrush Napoleon

Napoleon’s toothbrush

In 1794 Effingham sold his business to Jacob Schieffelin and John Lawrence and retired to his country estate in Flushing. This sale had long-term consequences for the family, as we shall see.

The Quaker roots of the family were important in establishing its role in the pharmaceutical business.

When Schieffelin and John Lawrence entered into the drug business, the trade was primarily conducted by wholesale houses in New York and Philadelphia. Before the Revolutionary War, drugs and botanicals had been mostly supplied by the English. By the time of the Revolution, about half of the drug manufacturing in England was controlled by the Quakers. Quaker pharmacists in America had ready access to the latest and most up-to-date information thanks to their coreligionists in England. At the end of the eighteenth century, druggists provided a wide array of medicines, botanical products, cooking spices, surgical supplies, medicine chests, as well items found today in hardware stores — paints and glassware, for example — to general stores, physicians, farmers, plantations, ships, and apothecary shops. Soon after the beginning of the eighteenth century, many druggists and apothecaries had expanded into chemical manufacturing, an activity that accelerated during the Revolutionary War, when, cut off from England, druggists learned new manufacturing techniques to produce the embargoed chemicals.

Leave a Comment

Hannah Lawrence the Poetess

February 10, 2015 in Lawrence Family, Uncategorized 2 Comments Tags: Genealogy

Hannah lawrence

Hannah Lawrence (1758-1838) was the fourth great grand aunt of my wife. Hannah, like most members of the numerous Lawrence clan, was a Quaker, but she did not let this deter her from an assertive and adventurous life.

The Quakers, as pacifists, tired to stay neutral during the American Revolution, but most of the Lawrences sympathized with the American side and some of the teenage boys and young men joined the militia. Hannah was not to able to fight, but she was a poetess and used her poetic talents against the British.

In the poem “Interposition” she wrote: “They [the British] fly to crush the blameless son of freedom and of me.” She also wrote a poem “On the Purpose to which the Avenue Adjoining Trinity Church has of late been dedicated,1779,” about the behavior of British soldiers, had it privately printed and dropped it on sidewalks.

This is the scene of gay resort,

Here Vice and Folly hold their court,

Here all the Martial band parade,

To vanquish — some unguarded Maid.

Here ambles many a dauntless chief

Who can — oh great ! beyond belief,

Who can — as sage Historians say,

Defeat — whole bottles in array!

 

Heavens ! shall a mean, inglorious train,

The mansions of our dead profane?

A herd of undistinguish’d things.

That shrink beneath the power of Kings!

 

Sons of the brave immortal band

Who led fair Freedom to this land,

Say — shall a lawless race presume

To violate the sacred Tomb?

And calmly, you, the insult bear —

Even wildest rage were virtue here.

 

Shades of our Sires, indignant rise,

Oh arm! to vengeance, arm the skies.

Oh rise! for no degenerate son

 

Bids impious blood the guilt atone,

By thunder from the ethereal plains.

Avenge your own dishonored Manes,

And guardian lightnings flash around,

And vindicate the hallow’d ground!

In the meanwhile the British officer Jacob Schieffelin (about whom much more in future blogs) came to New York. He got one glimpse of Hannah and fell in love. He got himself billeted in the Lawrence house, and very shortly she returned his affections, having, as she said, “opportunity almost hourly of discovering new merits.”

Jacob Schieffelin

Jacob Schieffelin

She wrote the story of the courtship. “A Journal of a Lady’s Courtship,” in which she assumed the name Lavinia and gave Jacob the name Altamont. On July 29, 1780 she wrote, “the World, the world will condemn me for imprudence.” She started thinking of a course of action that “would shock those whose esteem is most dear to me, and astonish those who ever heard the name of Mathilda,” under which she had written her anti-British poems.

John Lawrence, her father, was not happy, but she married Jacob secretly at a friend’s house. Two days later she was disowned by the Quaker meeting. She and Jacob set off to Montreal bearing dispatches. She wrote a journal of her trip. Here is her description of Niagara Falls.

I proceeded … by slow and intricate windings up that rugged mountain, and contemplated the native wilderness of the scene through which we passed, till my ears were struck with the approaching sound of the falling torrent, and a sudden shower gave us to know that it could not be far distant, while innumerable isicles shook from the trees, on our heads, at every breath of wind, and were as quickly replaced by the constant succession of vapours condensing on the branches.

A considerable River first appeared, rolling down a gradual descent, and forming with the rapidity of its motion over the broken rocks, as we approached nearer the bank which had been worn away to an amazing depth, we were struck with motionless astonishment at the stupendous object that met our view, neither our surprize nor the deafening noise we heard, would admit of exclamation, we therefore stood gazing in silent awe and admiration. The whole River rushing abruptly down a terrific precipice, and rebounding in shattered particles, from the violence of its fall on said rocks, to nearly the height from whence it had precipitated itself. The earth seemed to tremble at the shock, and our sinking hearts corresponded with the idea. …

We prepared to descend [the path] to a level with the River … this with great difficulty, caution and the assistance of poles to prevent slipping we effected. … one of the gentlemen … then led me to a point of the rock that projected out in front of the Fall, from whence I could see the River descend as it were from the clouds, and with my eye follow its course, from its first rushing over the top, till it reached the margin of the stream below. … I grew giddy at the view.

She also met Indians, including the Iroquois Loyalist Molly Brant.

 

Molly Brant 1

 Molly Brant, British Heroine

Molly Brant

Joseph Brant, her brother

She was a bit taken aback at the personal jewelry worn by the Indian allies of the British.

The sight of a fire in the Wilderness drew us to it in the evening, and I as a little surprised to find it surrounded by Indians. Under the shelter of an inverted canoe were seated two Warriors, with their wives and children, they made room for me between them with the greatest civility and perceiving I was a little frightened…they desired me in their language to take courage. Their heads were shaved and painted, and their appearance altogether savage, but their manners were not at all so — I was shocked to see a scalp dangling by my side from one of their ears; it was the size of a dollar, and fixed in a wooden ring, while a lock of beautiful dark hair hang on his horrid shoulder. On my observing it, he pointed to his head and pronounced the word “Yankee.”

She and Jacob returned to New York after the Revolution. He took over the Lawrence’s fledgling pharmaceutical business, and she settled down to steady ways.

Jacob Schieffflin and wife

Jacob and Hannah

Jacob founded Manhattanville. There he built St. Mary’s Episcopal Church. It was a free church (no pew rents) and, as Hannah was an abolitionist, it welcomed blacks. Jacob and Hannah are buried in the church.

StMaryEpisOldExt

Old St Mary’s Episcopal, Harlem

Jacob Schieffelin's vault

Hic jacent Jacobus et Hannah

Leave a Comment

St. Scholastica and the Power of Twins

February 10, 2015 in Catholic Church, Uncategorized No Comments Tags: monasticism, St. Benedict, St. Scholastica, twins

Scholastica

Benedict and Scholastica

Today is the feast of St. Scholastica, the twin sister of St. Benedict. St. Gregory the Great tells this story:

She was accustomed to visiting her brother once a year. He would come down to meet her at a place on the monastery property, not far outside the gate.

One day she came as usual and her saintly brother went with some of his disciples; they spent the whole day praising God and talking of sacred things. As night fell they had supper together.

Their spiritual conversation went on and the hour grew late. The holy nun said to her brother: “Please do not leave me tonight; let us go on until morning talking about the delights of the spiritual life”. “Sister”, he replied, “what are you saying? I simply cannot stay outside my cell”.

When she heard her brother refuse her request, the holy woman joined her hands on the table, laid her head on them and began to pray. As she raised her head from the table, there were such brilliant flashes of lightning, such great peals of thunder and such a heavy downpour of rain that neither Benedict nor his brethren could stir across the threshold of the place where they had been seated. Sadly he began to complain: “May God forgive you, sister. What have you done?” “Well”, she answered, “I asked you and you would not listen; so I asked my God and he did listen. So now go off, if you can, leave me and return to your monastery”.

Reluctant as he was to stay of his own will, he remained against his will. So it came about that they stayed awake the whole night, engrossed in their conversation about the spiritual life.

It is not surprising that she was more effective than he, since as John says, God is love, it was absolutely right that she could do more, as she loved more.

Three days later, Benedict was in his cell. Looking up to the sky, he saw his sister’s soul leave her body in the form of a dove, and fly up to the secret places of heaven. Rejoicing in her great glory, he thanked almighty God with hymns and words of praise. He then sent his brethren to bring her body to the monastery and lay it in the tomb he had prepared for himself.

Their minds had always been united in God; their bodies were to share a common grave.

Western monasticism was basically formed by Benedict. Unlike Eastern monasticism, it is less extreme, Benedict’s Rule is full of moderate, common sense, to help ordinary Christians lead a life dedicated to work and prayer.

The balance and moderation is partly due to Benedict’s Roman character. But it was also due to his having a twin sister. They grew in the womb together, and nursed together. Benedict always had an intimate and affectionate relationship with a woman, but a relationship which was totally non-sexual. This, I think, gave him a more stable personality than many of the Eastern founders of monasticism who had spectacular temptations against chastity. Benedict’s stability of personality was reflected in his Rule, and that Rule has had profound influence on the character of Western civilization.

We therefore owe much that is moderate and wholesome in our culture to St. Scholastica, who, it will be noted, had a mind of her own and did not meekly accede to Benedict’s decision to leave.

Leave a Comment

Frederick Francis Alexandre, the Founder

February 10, 2015 in Alexandre Family, Uncategorized 9 Comments Tags: Alexandre Line, City of Vera Cruz wreck, City of Washington wreck, Frederick Francis Alexandre, Genealogy

Alexandre Lines

Francois or Frederick Francis Alexandre (1809-1889) was the founder of the family fortune and my wife’s great great grandfather. His was a real American success story. His obituary gives some details of his life:

Francois Alexandre, a merchant, born in Jersey on 5 August 1809, died in New York City on 8 June 1889. He was the son of a farmer. With an inclination for a sailor’s life, he went to sea at an early age, and acquired an education by attending school during his stay in various ports and devoting the spare time on ship to reading.

At the age of twenty-one he took command of a vessel, which he directed for years, renouncing in favor of his sisters the estate which he had inherited from his father. When about 28 years old, the young captain settled in New York City, establishing a small commission house in South Street, paying at first an annual rent of $25.

In 1842 he established a line of sailing vessels between New York and Honduras, and subsequently between New York, Vera Cruz and South America. In this enterprise he succeeded so well that, in 1867, he sold the sailing vessels, substituted steamers, and for 19 years carried mails, freights and passengers between New York, Havana, and Mexico.

A few clarifications can be added to this brief account.

He was born on St. Heller Isle. When his father died when Francis was thirteen, under the English law of primogeniture he would get the family property, but renounced it because his “sturdy English self-reliance.” He went to sea “before the mast.” At twenty-one he commanded the Nina on a voyage from Liverpool to Rio de Janeiro. He was active in the Brazil trade, but saw greater possibilities in New York. When he married in 1838, he gave up sailing and opened a chandler’s shop on Washington Street in Manhattan.

He quickly branched out into shipping, and at one point owned fourteen ships. The Alexandre line was the first to have regularly scheduled sailing between New York, Cuba, and Mexico.  It got a subsidy from the Mexican government to carry the mail. It also began the Caribbean tourism business. The Alexandre company issued to pamphlet, New and Varied Excursion to the Tropics for Invalids and Tourists. A tourist guide noted that the sailings were regular but not always on schedule:

The Alexandre line publishes a pamphlet in which the time of the voyage from New Orleans to Vera Cruz is stated as “about five days” and from New York to Vera Cruz as “about ten days.” This statement often proves untrue, unless great latitude is given to the word “about.”

Weather was unpredictable, and could delay landing in Mexico for days.

The company flourished for decades. However, in 1887 the government of Mexico transferred its subsidy to a heavily subsided Spanish shipping company and te line was no longer viable. Alexandre and his sons liquidated the company and sold its ships to its competitor, the Ward Line (of Moro Castle fame). Francis died on June 8, 1889.

In 1838 Francis had married Marie Civilise Cipriant (1811-1882). He was Episcopalian and she was Catholic. He never became Catholic, but attended church with her. Three sons, John, Joseph, and Henry survived him.

The Alexandre Line Ships

City of Puebla painting

 The City of Puebla

The Alexandre line has introduced another improvement, in such ships as the City of Pueblo. The saloon is provided with small tables, as in a restaurant. The passenger is not obliged to eat with a crowd of strangers, but selects his own time for meals, paying only for what he orders.

 

City of Washington

 The City of Washington

 The City of Washington was launched on August 30, 1877 in Chester, Pennsylvania.

she can accommodate 100 first-class passengers, with 75 state rooms, besides accommodations for officers, crew and 250 steerage passengers.

The City of Washington was sold to the Ward Lines, and had an exciting career.

The night the Maine exploded in Havana Harbor (February 15, 1898), the City of Washington was also moored in Havana Harbor. Moored in close proximity to the Maine, the City of Washington suffered injury to her awnings, raise and deck houses by flying debris. Immediately after the explosion, finding the Maine a disaster, the crew of the City of Washington went to aid the Maine. The first round of emergency boats lowered were destroyed by flying shrapnel. After the second round of boats reached the water, the City of Washington, and the Spanish cruiser, Alfonso XII assisted in the rescue of the crew of the Maine. The City of Washington formed a makeshift hospital from their dining salon.

Eventually the City of Washington was cut down and used as a coal barge.

On July 10, 1917, City of Washington and another barge, Seneca, were under tow by the tugboat Luckenbach 4 when all three vessels ran aground on a shallow reef near Key Largo in the Florida Keys.

City of Washington wreck

 

The wreck of the City of Washington has become a popular dive site.

The City of Vera Cruz 

On August 28, 1880, a terrible hurricane struck the City of Vera Cruz. One of the steamer’s lifeboats was loaded with people and readied for launching, but the boat was dashed to pieces before they even reached the water. Those who were not crushed to death outright were dropped, half stunned, into the sea, where they were drowned. A second boat met the same fate.

Men and Women were in the cabin praying and shrieking, and screaming. All of a sudden there was a snapping sound as of many timbers giving way. In the next minute the City of Vera Cruz went down, carrying all aboard. Then one person and another came to the top, grasping wildly for something to support them. The nearest land (Cape Canaveral, Florida) was almost thirteen miles away, and there was no way that the current was going to let them swim straight for it. The water was dotted with their heads and was filled with heavy pieces of wreck. Some of them were struck by this stuff, and so much stunned that they went down again, never to come up. Sixty nine men women and children perished.

Somehow, eleven men found the courage, strength and stamina to survive the mountainous seas and the foam which they sucked in with each tortured breath. Twenty six hours later the, by then, nude, battered and exhausted survivors struggled ashore about fifteen to twenty miles south of Daytona.

General Torbert, an old man with a white beard, who had once fought bravely in the Civil War, was among those who managed to make it to the beach alive. The fearless, but tender General had sought to calm the crying children before the ship sank, and he deserved to live. But, the General’s old body had been pushed to far, and he died at the water’s edge.

A mother, tightly clasping her daughter to her chest, was sighted shortly after the ship went down. A day later, over thirty miles from the wreck, still bound in the same embrace, they came ashore, but both were dead. Seaman James H. Kelly had saved the lives of others on four previous occasions, and it was now his turn to be saved. Kelly may have felt the hand of God on his shoulder as he stumbled ashore. But Kelly and the others who survived the tempest were to live with the nightmare of it for the rest of their lives.

City of Vera Cruz wreck

City of Vera Cruz 2

City of Vera Cruz parts

City of Vera Cruz letter

It has become a popular dive site. Shipwrecks, Inc. has tried to locate and salvage treasure. Two passengers were jewelers who were taking their products to Mexico to open a store there.

Leave a Comment

Effingham Embree the Clockmaker

February 8, 2015 in Lawrence Family, Uncategorized 4 Comments Tags: Effingham Embree, Quaker marriage, Society for teh Manumission of Slaves

Effingham Embree (1759=1817) was the husband of the 4th great grand aunt (Mary Lawrence, 1763-1831) of my wife. He was probably named after his uncle, Effingham Lawrence. The Embrees continued to bestow the name of Effingham on their children down to the present day.

The Businessman

He was a clockmaker, businessman, and land speculator in New York.

He was born in Flushing, but moved to Manhattan to learn the clock making trade.. By 1781 Effingham and Thomas Pearsall were conducting a watch making business together. By 1789 Effingham was in business for himself, making clocks and watches and selling jewelry from his shop at 185 Pearl Street (named Queen Street during the British occupation).

It would be more accurate to call Effingham a clock assembler rather than a maker. Like others in the trade, he purchased parts locally and from England and assembled them in a way to guarantee the accuracy of the movements. Some wooden cases were made locally, others imported. But his name engraved on the dial indicate that he had assembled the clock and guaranteed its accuracy.

Pearsall and Embree clock

A Pearsall and Embree clock

White House Embree

 Effingham Embree tall clock in Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House

It was presented in 1976 as as the Bicentennial gift of the Society of Colonial Dames.

Effingham Embree Clock

Another Effingham Embree tall clock

Effingham watch

An Effingham Embree watch with his name engraved on it

Effingham signature

A receipt with his signature

Effingham engaged in land speculation. He owned large tracts of unimproved land in New York, Pennsylvania, and Kentucky. Closer to home he bought, divided, and sold land in Manhattan. His deals in 1785 involved the equivalent of about $600,000 in 2015 dollars. He also loaned money. Lawsuits for unpaid loans indicate the scale of his transactions: one was for $200,000 in 2015 dollars.

Effingham invested in the Tontine Coffee House, which provided a home for the fledgling New York Stock Exchange.

Tontine Coffee House with flag on left

Tontine Coffee House: building on left with flag

The Citizen

Although a Quaker, when he was 16, in 1775, Effingham joined Captain Egbert’s company. He was a member of the St. Tammany society. The members put on war paint and feathers to parade and to feast on various patriotic holidays. It evolved into Tammany Hall.

St. Tammany

The Legendary St. Tammany

Effingham was one of the first members of the Society for the Manumission of Slaves; John Jay was the first president. The Society was for gradual abolition. It also maintained a registry of free blacks to protect against kidnapping and re-enslavement. The Society persuaded the government of New York to forbid the export and import of slaves, but slavery was not abolished completely until July 4, 1827  In 1786 the Society stared a free school for African boys, Effingham was a trustee.

Manumission

John Jay, Governor Clinton, and Effingham , and about half of the members of the society owned slaves. Slaves could not be freed unless the State agreed that they were able to support themselves, so owners had to continue to own and support slaves, even as they worked for the full abolition of slavery.

The Marriage

Effingham and Mary were first cousins. Both families were Quakers, and the Quakers frowned upon marriages between such close relatives.  Nonetheless Effingham and Mary married in December 1780 when New York was still under British occupation .

The Women’s Minutes of the Flushing Monthly meeting was held on February 7, 1781 decided:

Wheras Mary Embree (late Lawrence) was Educated in the Profession of Truth, which would if attended to preserve us in a Steady Uniform Conduct, hath so far deviated therefrom, & the Principals there of us to Marry he First Cousin, which Marriage was Accomplished by a Priest, which practices we Testify against & disown that said Mary Embree from being a Member of our Religious Society until from a Sense of her Misconduct she Condemns the same to the Satisfaction of the Meeting.

(The “priest” was a clergyman of some other denomination; the Quakers have no clergy.)

Effingham demonstrated repentance and joined the Flushing meeting in 1797; Mary waited until 1815 to apply, and then it was not to the Flushing but to the New York Meeting, although she was living in Flushing.

Flushing Meeting house

Flushing Meeting House, built 1694

In 1796 Effingham gave up his shop and moved back to the Flushing farm. He died of consumption, that is, tuberculosis, on December 3, 1817.

(Many thanks to his descendent, Mary Ellen Embree LeBien, and her book Embree Remembered [2002])

Leave a Comment

More Musical Notes: The Russians Are Coming!

February 6, 2015 in Music, Russia No Comments

Pianist

Last night we heard the Mariinsky Orchestra with Valery Gergiev.  As we arrived at Hayes Hall in Naples, we met a group of protestors on the sidewalk. I assumed they were Ukrainians protesting Gergiev, who is in tight with Putin. They should have been the local audiologists’ association.

The Russians go in for big, big sounds. The orchestra was big and chose to make the most of it. Following Napoleon’s strategy in dealing with Russians,  I retreated to the last row.

Denis Matsuev played the rarely heard Piano Concerto No. 2.  Having heard it, I realized why it was rarely heard. When Tchaikovsky wrote his Piano Concerto No 1, the pianist insisted on all sorts of changes, and the result was a success. Tchaikovsky got his own way with the Concerto No. 2, and the result was not happy.  It was a hodge-podge. But Matsuev dazzled with his playing, especially the last movement with its runs of fast 16th notes, con fuoco.

His playing reminded me of the passage from P. G. Woodhouse.  All was not well between Muriel and Sacheverell.

Muriel was playing the piano when Sacheverell came into the drawing-room some forty minutes after the conclusion of the dinner. She was interpreting a work by one of those Russian composers who seem to have been provided by Nature especially with a view to soothing the nervous systems of young girls who are not feeling quite themselves. It was a piece from which the best results are obtained by hauling off and delivering a series of overhand swings which make the instrument wobble like the engine-room of a liner; and Muriel, who was a fine, sturdy girl, was putting a lot of beef into it.

Leave a Comment

Musical Notes from All Over

February 6, 2015 in Germany, Music No Comments Tags: Bungert, Zeppelin

Zeppelin

In researching in old newspapers, my wandering eye alights on gems which should not be lost to memory. Here is an article from the New York Times, November 30, 1909

Zeppelin in New Symphony 

Count’s First Voyage

the Theme of August Bungert’s New Work 

Berlin, Nov. 29. August Bungert’s new symphony, “Zeppelin’s First Voyage,” will be produced under the direction of Prof. William Res at Coblenz on Wednesday. The work is dedicated to Count Zeppelin and furnishes another indication of the modern spirit of music by introducing the automobile horn as an orchestral instrument.

The theme describes the preparations for the Count’s ascent in his first dirigible balloon, the smooth flight, the applause of the multitudes as the airship passes over the plains, the mountains, the valleys, and the cities, the thunderstorm, the landing and finally the destruction of the aerocraft by fire.

Somehow it never entered the repertoire

Leave a Comment

James Pollock and “In God We Trust”

February 5, 2015 in Rutters, Uncategorized 2 Comments Tags: Genealogy, Governor James Pollock, In God We Trust, Know Nothings, Pennsylvania State University, Sunday Schools

James Pollock

Portrait of James Pollock by John F. Francis

James Pollock was my wife’s third great grand uncle. He was the uncle of Sarah Pollock, the wife of James H. Rutter.

James Pollock was born on September 11, 1810, in Milton, Northumberland County, Pennsylvania, of Scotch-Irish Presbyterian parents. He graduated from the College of New Jersey (Princeton University) with a bachelor’s and master’s degree, both with highest honors.  (He later became President of Princeton’s Board of Trustees.) He returned home to set up a law practice. He was appointed a judge and a district attorney, and in 1844 was elected to the U. S. House of Representatives, where he served three terms. While he was in Washington, he shared a boardinghouse with Abraham Lincoln and they became friends.

Pollock was keen on technology. He supported Samuel Morse and his idea for a telegram and was in the room when the famous message, “What hath God wrought” was received.  He also pushed for the construction of a transcontinental railroad; in 1848 he said, “At the risk of being considered insane, I will venture the prediction that, in less than twenty-five years from this evening, a railroad will be completed and in operation between New York and San Francisco, California.”   It was finally completed in 1869.

After the left the House, Pollock was appointed a federal judge in Pennsylvania. In 1854 the Whigs nominated Pollock for the governorship of Pennsylvania. He was also supported by the Nativist Know-Nothings  (of which Samuel Morse was a member) who were anti-slavery.

James Pollock Inau

Inauguration of Governor James Pollock

Pollock defeated the Democratic candidate, and began selling off the obsolete public works of the state, the canals and portage railroad which were outmoded by the new railroads and which were beset by corrupt administration. These works had been a drain on the public treasury. Pollock reduced state debt and lowered taxes. He chartered State Normal Schools and Pennsylvania State University and located it in the middle of the state.

In 1855 in thanksgiving for the harvest and the preservation of the country from war, Pollock signed a Thanksgiving Proclamation, which concluded:

Acknowledging with grateful hearts these manifold blessings of a beneficent Providence we should “offer unto God thanksgiving, and pay our vows unto the Most High.”

Under the solemn conviction of the importance and propriety of this duty, and in conformity with the wishes of many good citizens, I, James Pollock,  Governor of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, do herby appoint Thursday, the 22nd of November next,  as a day of General Thanksgiving and Praise throughout this State; and earnestly implore the people that, setting aside all worldly pursuits on that day,  they unite in offering thanks to Almighty God for his past goodness and mercy; and beseech him for a continuation of his blessings.”

In the prelude to the War between the States, the country was convulsed by the controversy over the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which would undo the anti-slavery provisions of the Missouri Compromise.  Pollock served as head of the Pennsylvania delegation at the Washington Peace Conference in 1861 and attempted to avert war. He was unsuccessful.

Pollock was a man of great Christian faith. He presided over the American Sunday School Union from 1855 until his death. It was said ‘he was always eager to do his Lord’s business with earnestness and dispatch’ and while conscious of the power of his masterful mind and loving heart, his fellows managers ‘most appreciated his depth of consecration.’

In 1861 Lincoln appointed Pollock the Director of the U S. Mint in Philadelphia.

in his 1863 report to the Secretary of the Treasury, he [Pollock] wrote, “We claim to be a Christian nation—why should we not vindicate our character by honoring the God of Nations…Our national coinage should do this. Its legends and devices should declare our trust in God—in Him who is “King of Kings and Lord of Lords.” The motto suggested, “God our Trust,” is taken from our National Hymn, the Star-Spangled Banner.” The sentiment is familiar to every citizen of our country—it has thrilled the hearts and fallen in song from the lips of millions of American Freemen. The time for the introduction of this or a similar motto, is propitious and appropriate. ‘Tis an hour of National peril and danger—an hour when man’s strength is weakness—when our strength and our nation’s strength and salvation, must be in the God of Battles and of Nations. Let us reverently acknowledge his sovereignty, and let our coinage declare our trust in God.”

Oh! thus be it ever, when freemen shall stand
Between their loved homes and the war’s desolation!
Blest with victory and peace, may the heaven-rescued land
Praise the Power that hath made and preserved us a nation.
Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just,
And this be our motto: “In God is our trust.”
And the star-spangled banner in triumph shall wave
O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave!

He died on April 19, 1890; his reputation of honesty and integrity was recognized even by his enemies. In the funeral sermon, the Rev. John Hemphill proclaimed:

I look back over fifty years of American history, and I can find no man as conspicuous as he in  civic life, who can claim precedence of him  in all the qualities that go to make up a noble, moral manhood. For fully half a century he was exposed to influences which have wrought the undoing of thousands, but he kept “his garments unspotted from the world.” He could have died a millionaire, but, loathing alike the bribe giver and the bribe taker, he died with clean hands and a clean soul, leaving to his children, and to his children’s children, and to the whole Church of God, the glorious heritage of a “good name” which is far better than “great riches.”

James Pollock Monumnet 2

His tombstone monument appropriately reads:

“James Pollock 1810-1890 ‘In God We Trust’”

At a website there are dozens of memorials to Pollock. One is

Honoring you on your 121st anniversary in heaven.

And another, by a great, great great grandniece:

Perhaps we will meet in Heaven dearest Uncle. May you rest in peace. It took me a long time to find you, but I am proud to have done so.

In God We Trust

 

Leave a Comment

The Railroad Rutters

February 4, 2015 in Rutters 1 Comment Tags: Chancellorsville, Genealogy, James H. Rutter, Nathaniel Rutter, New York Central, Willaim Vanderbilt, William Rutter

The Rutters were involved in the railroad business for generations.

William Edward Rutter was my wife’s third great grandfather. He was involved in the transition between horse carriages and railroad carriages.

The Elmira Car Works was founded at Elmira, New York, in 1851 by William E. Rutter, as a car repair shop servicing the newly constructed New York & Erie Railroad. A year later it began to build cars.

Elmira Car Works’ founder, William E. Rutter (1812-1882), was born in Providence, Rhode Island, and had learned the trade of carpenter in Baltimore. (One source says he was an experienced carriage builder.) In the early 1830s he went to work for the Boston & Providence Railroad, and later became master mechanic on their Stonington line. He moved to Elmira only a little before opening his plant.

In 1848 he sold his plant to the Erie railroad, but stayed on as manager.

His sons were William Rutter (?-1854), Nathaniel Rutter (1841-1863) and James H. Rutter (1836-1885), from whom my wife is descended.

William Rutter died young. He had a heart attack on October 18, 1854 when he was responding to a fire with Young America Hose Company.

Nathaniel Rutter enlisted as a second lieutenant in the 107th New York Regiment, “Campbell Guards.” He rose to the rank of captain December 31, 1862, fought in the first battle of Antietam, was killed by a shell at the battle of Chancellorsville on May 1, 1863. He was twenty-two. Col Colbey described him as “a worthy and competent officer.”

The 107th New York

This regiment, known as the Campbell Guards, was recruited in the counties of Chemung, Schuyler and Steuben, rendezvoused at Elmira, and was there mustered into the U. S. service for three years, Aug. 13, 1862. It was a fine regiment, noted for its efficiency and discipline, the first regiment from the North organized under the second call, and the first to arrive at Washington, in acknowledgment of which it received a banner from the state and a personal visit from the president. It was raised by two patriotic members of the legislature, Robert B. Van Valkenburg, and Alexander S. Diven, who became colonel and lieutenant-colonel, respectively. It left the state on Aug. 13, 1862; was stationed in the defenses of Washington for a month; was then assigned to the 1st division (Williams), 12th corps (Mansfield), and fought its first battle at Antietam, where it was heavily engaged, losing 63 in killed, wounded and missing. The veteran Gen. Mansfield fell, mortally wounded at Antietam, and Gen. Henry W. Slocum succeeded to the command of the corps. The regiment was again heavily engaged at the disastrous battle of Chancellorsville, where the brunt of the fighting fell on the 3d and 12th corps, and lost in this action 83 killed, wounded and missing, among the killed being Capt. Nathaniel E. Rutter.

Chancellorsville 3

 

Chancellorsville 2

James H. Rutter was my wife’s great great grandfather. He was born February 3, 1836 in Lowell, Massachusetts. He studied at the Scholfield Business School and At the age of 18, in 1854, he started his career as a clerk in the fright office of the Erie Railroad. The next year he became chief clek in the freight office of the Williamsport and Elmira Railroad. In 1857, at the age of twenty-one, he became chief clerk in the Chicago freight office of the Michigan Central and Northern Indian Railroad. In 1858 he became freight agent of the Chicago and Milwaukee Railroad. In 1860 he was back in Elmira as the stationmaster of the Erie Railroad. In 1864 he became freight agent in Buffalo of the Erie Railroad, and in 1866 the assistant general freight agent.

While testifying about railroad rates, he impressed William H. Vanderbilt, who hired him in 1870 as the General Freight Agent of the New York Central with the salary of $15,000 a year ($250,000 in 2015 dollars).  In 1877 he became a director of the New York Central, in 1880 Third Vice-President, and in 1883, at the age of forty-seven, President of the New York Central.

NYC

William Vanderbilt had been in poor health, (high blood pressure, mild stroke); he had sons, but knew that Rutter was more intelligent and competent.

Mark Twain was scheduled to meet Rutter in 1885 to interest him in investing in the printing telegraph and the typesetter that Twain hoped would make his fortune, but Rutter was ill with diabetes at his house in Irvington and died on June 27, 1885.

At the same time, unbeknownst to each other, his wife Sarah Pollack Rutter was dying of brain inflammation. She died the next day, June 28, 1885.

They were buried from St. Thomas Church in New York at the same service. They left several children. They named one Nathaniel, after his uncle who had died at Chancellorsville, and ever afterwards there have been Nathaniels in the family.  Their son, Nathaniel Enzie Rutter, was my wife’s great grandfather.

Leave a Comment

A Brief Note on the Jules Reynal Roche Fermoy de Saint-Michels

February 3, 2015 in Thebaud-Reynal, Uncategorized 2 Comments Tags: Genealogy, Jules Reynal, Rocky Dell, St. John's White Plains

Jules Reynal Roche Fermoy de Saint-Michel was born in Martinique in 1838 and came to the Unites States in 1848. He married  Nathalie Florence Higgins (1848-1901). They were the parents of Mathilde Reynal, the wife of Paul Gilbert Thebaud, Sr., they of the stolen jewels.

Several members of the Renal family used the full form of their name –  Reynal Roche Fermoy de Saint-Michel – or insisted of the French pronunciation of their first and last names. New Yorkers found this insufferably pretentious. But if my last name were Reynal Roche Fermoy de Saint-Michel I would be strongly tempted to flaunt it in the faces of all the Smiths and Joneses, not to mention the van-Thises and the van-Thats.

Jules, according to a descendent, was “a poor but noble Frenchman,  descended from French Huguenots from Normandy.” His ancestor had come from China to New York in 1771. His wife came from a wealthy family. Her father, Nathaniel Higgins, a carpet manufacturer, in 1882 left $1,500,000 (c. $35,000,000 in 2015 dollars) to the Reynal children. When Jules Reynal died in 1894, he left an estate of only $50,000.

As my wife has noticed, her New York family were the Kardashians of their day. A marital spat and the separation of Jules and Natalie were detailed in the papers. Nathalie remained in the Madison Avenue townhouse with the children while Jules moved to a hotel. But in 1894 he became ill; the children, although members of the jeunesse doree, as the papers put it,  and his alienated wife nursed him, and all was well and everyone went to the country seat Rocky Dell, in Westchester County.

Rocky-Dell-Farm-Residence-of-J-Reynal-Esq-White-Plain

Rocky Dell

There Jules and his son Eugene after him were masters of hound with the Westchester Hunt Club. Jules commisoned portraits of his dogs from Arthur Fitzwilliam Tait.

In September 1879, Jules shot a three-legged woodcock near his house in White Plains; it made it into the Scientific American.

Three legged woodcock

Genuine Three-Legged Woodcock

Nathalie was a great tea and luncheon giver.

In 1889 she offered lunch to 90 ladies at 14 tables.

In the centre of each was a large Dresden candelabrum, with wax lights, each light having a delicate satin shade. The menu was printed on the inside of folding tablets, the exterior of which was of red satin. The family monogram was painted on each in gold, and the name of the guest was underneath the monogram.  The floral favors were in the form of gentlemen’s hats, Indian hampers, and double baskets. These were all filled with the choicest flowers of the season.

A notable feature of the occasion was the elegance of the toilets.

The papers detailed the arrangements of an 1896 affair:

Some of the twenty matrons who attended the mauve luncheon insist it was one of the prettiest ever given in town. It was mauve and gold, and mostly the latter. All the plates that were not gold were mauve color. Even the ices were mauve colored, and a  great mound of the lavender orchids was on the table. Clusters of these tied with a ribbon to match were at each place.

Nathalie summered (note teh Wasp verb) at Bar Harbor, first at Ban-Y-Bryn:

Ban-Y-Brynban y Bryn raer 1

Designed by Architect S. V. Stratton, Ban-y-Bryn was built on a steep bluff, with the front of the cottage facing the rustic Maine landscape.  The rear of the home, with its prominent turret and several grand porches, overlooked Frenchman’s Bay.  Rising to four stories, the home consisted of 27 rooms, including seven bedrooms, five bathrooms, five fireplaces, a large stable, seven servants’ bedrooms, and additional servants’ facilities.

And then at Cornersmeet. There she got into trouble.

Her doctor had told her to eat s partridge a day.  She served twenty-five of them out of season in September 1889. The Maine State Game Warden heard about it, and called at Cornersmeet. The housekeeper confessed, Nathalie ended up paying a fine of $254 and stormed out of Bar Harbor, threatening never to return. Society was aghast.

All day society  has been indignantly discussing the “outrage,” and the opinion has become quite thoroughly crystallized that a law which attempts to obstruct the gastronomic enjoyment of people is a baneful one.

In March 1901 Mrs Reynal, her son Eugene Sugny, and his fiancée Adeleide Fitzgerald  were at Gedney Farms the home of the Willets (where the theft of the Thebaud jewels would later occur). Eugene and Adelaide both came down with scarlet fever and the house was quarantined. Eugene at first recovered but then started failing. A priest was summoned to administer last rites to Eugene. Adelaide was alarmed, and without telling the parents, had the priest marry them in the sick room, with only the doctor and nurse as witnesses.

Nathalie built the church of St. John the Evangelist in White Plains as a memorial to her son Jules, who died as a child. She bought the land, built the church, furnished it, and turned it over to the congregation debt-free in 1892. She was buried from there after her death on May 2, 1901.

St. Johns Church White Plains, NY

St .John the Evangelist

In 1910 the New York, Westchester, and Boston Railroad, a J. P. Morgan folly, wanted to build a line through Rocky Dell. The then-owner, Nathaniel Reynal, would not sell a right of way because the railroad would be within a few hundred feet of his house, and the railroad did not want to buy the whole estate.

Change was inevitable, and the Reynal estate was subdivided.

Rocky Dell Park

It is now the Rocky Dell and Reynal Park neighborhoods.

 

Leave a Comment

Paul Gibert Thebaud, Jr., and the Servant Problem

February 1, 2015 in Thebaud-Reynal 2 Comments Tags: John Bjorlin, Paul Gibert Thebaud Jr.

Paul Gibert Thebaud Jr. was born on October 17, 1891. He attended Pomret School.

Pomfret School

The Case of the Swedish Butler

John Bjorlin was born in Stockholm of a well to do family. He attended Uppsala University and graduated summa cum laude. He spoke Russian, English, French, German, Spanish, and Italian.

But after graduating, he moved to Paris, and there got involved with unspecified “inclinations and habits” that caused his father to disown him and leave his property to John’s brother, Niels.

He was well educated but penniless, but his manners and his ability with languages enabled him to get jobs as an upper servant, as courier, interpreter, and head of household. In 1904 He married Kate Bobb in Philadelphia, but deserted her after three months.

The Thebauds hired him as the tutor for their son Paul Gibert Jr. He also accompanied the elder Thebaud on business trips in his import-export business as an interpreter.

In 1907 Bjorlin became more and more morose and started drinking heavily. He had a gun because of burglar scares in White Plains – and the Thebauds had already had a jewelry theft.

On November 10 Paul Jr. had been riding his motorcycle all day and retired exhausted.

At 5:50 AM on November 11, 1907, the night watchman roused Bjorlin, who, clad only in his bathrobe, went to Paul Jr.’s room and locked the door behind him. Shortly after that the watchman heard a shot, and a minute after that another shot. Bjorlin had put his gun to the forehead of the sleeping Paul Jr., shot him, and then put the gun to his own head and shot himself. Bjorlin died instantly with a bullet in his brain.

What lead Bjorlin to do this? Various theories were put forward in the newspapers:

  1. Bjorlin was suffering from delirium tremens and was totally insane.
  2. Bjorlin thought he heard a burglar in Paul’s room and shot the boy by mistake. When he say what a mistake he had made, he turned the gun on himself.
  3. Bjorlin and Paul were going to go hunting that morning. Bjorlin jokingly pointed the revolver a Paul; when it went off, he was horrified and decided to kill himself.
  4. Bjorlin intended to kill the other butler and shot Paul by mistake
  5. A burglar has shot them both.

But

  • Bjorlin had left a hurriedly written will on his desk
  • Bjorlin had made a list of all the people in the house he intended to kill, all the family and servants, with Paul Jr. as Number One.

It was clearly a matter of an attempted murder and a suicide. But what could have been the motive? Was it simply insanity?

The New York Times reported that

Bjorlin showed a great fondness for Paul Thebaud. They became almost inseparable companions.

Another paper reported that

Bjorlin, the other servants said, was so fond of young Thebaud that he scowled and fumed if the boy spoke kindly to anyone but him. Several times he threatened to thrash stablemen and undermen in the house whom he accused of currying favor with Paul.

Friends of the family had been suspicious of the relationship of Paul Jr. and Bjorlin. They said

the bond between them was strangely close for master and servant

and

from the beginning of his service had displayed extreme  affection for the young Paul.

The most likely explanation is that Bjorlin had become infatuated and obsessed with the boy. Bjorlin feared discharge and separation, so he decided to kill the boy he loved and himself. One can surmise the nature of the activities Bjorlin had engaged in in Paris. The investigation seems to have been quickly dropped and the official explanation was that Bjorlin had intended to kill the other butler. This unconvincing explanation is an indication that the detectives suspected what was going on, but did not want to embarrass either the boy (who was probably completely unaware of the nature of Bjorlin’s interest in him – it was a more innocent age) or the family.

Paul Jr. almost miraculously survived, seemingly unscathed. When he regained consciousness, he was told initially that he had fallen and hit his head on a radiator. Later he was told the truth, but he could supply no motive for Bjorlin’s actions.

A Mostly Normal Life

Paul Jr. took up race car driving.

Paul Gilbert Thebaud

 

During World War I he applied his expertise. He served

in a special innovative army corps in WWI devoted to motorcycles with sidecars and mounted machine guns.

On February 5, 1914, he married Dorothy Vander Hooge in a small ceremony at St. Agnes Church in Manhattan. They had had several children.

He was president of the St. Nicholas Society.

St. Nicholas Society

 Dedication of Sunnyside, the historic home of Washington Irving in Tarrytown, New York.

John D. Rockefeller, Jr., speaking. 

On left: Paul G. Thebaud (in sash), president of the St. Nicholas Society of the City of New York, is seated with other members of the society, accompanied with retainers of the society clad in costumes inspired by the tunics worn by pages in the service of the old Dutch Governors of New York. At rear, Frances Lehnerts, who sang the National Anthem during the dedication.  On right: Washington Irving III (1917-1968, great-great-grand nephew of Washington Irving) seated behind weathercock, Abby Aldrich Rockefeller, David Rockefeller (obscured), and Alice Runyan.

But he continued his love of motorcycles:

Even into his very later years, he was known to drive up in his motorcycle with sidecar from Greenwich, CT to Woods Hole, MA to catch the boat over to Nantucket for the summer.

He died September 2, 1983 in Connecticut.

Leave a Comment

Paul Gibert Thebaud Sr. and the Servant Problem

January 30, 2015 in Genealogy, Rutters 2 Comments Tags: Edward Kern, Genealogy, Hillair, Paul Gibert Thebaud

The Thebaud family is distantly related to the Alexandres. The wealthy Catholic families of New York tended to intermarry, just as the Quaker families did.  Paul Gibert Thebaud Sr. (1866-1925) was the husband of sister-in-law of the great grandmother of my wife. Paul Sr. married Mathilde Eugenie Reynal on June 16, 1889 in St. Francis Xavier. It was a spectacle:

The white marble altar was covered with candles; twenty priests in rich vestments and a hundred choristers thronged the chancel; the Archbishop [Corrigan]  in vestments of white and gold and wearing his jeweled mitre, performed the ceremony, while the bridal procession,  composed of twelve ushers, twenty bridesmaids, and the bride, leaning on her father’s arm, swept up the broad centre aisle to the superb wedding march from Lohengrin, rendered by a full string orchestra with organ accompaniment.

St, Francis Xavier ExtSt Franis Xavier Int

The bride’s dowry was $1,000,000 ($26,000,000 in 2015 dollars) and she also received 300 presents from the 3,000 guests:, including a complete dinner service in gold and silver.

Matilde Reynal

Mathilde was the sister of Nathaniel Reynal, the second husband of Sarah Caldwell (my wife is descended from her first husband, Nathaniel Rutter), and that is one way my wife is related to the Reynals, about whom much will be said in later blogs.

A distant relationship, but the families kept up contact, and a Mrs. Thebaud was the godmother of my wife’s uncle Teddy. When, as a child, he received a present from her, he asked his mother, “Who is ‘the bawd?’”

Paul Sr. was a commission merchant with the firm Paul G. and Paul L. Thebaud, which had been founded as Bouchard, Thebaud and Co. in 1789. Paul Sr. did well for himself. A taste for big houses runs through all the family He had a town house on Madison Avenue, and decided to build a mansion in White Plains. While he was building it he stayed in White Plains, with friends, the Howard Willets.

There a crime, which sounds like it had been plotted by P.G. Woodhouse, affected the tranquility of the Thebauds.

Mr. and Mrs. Edward Kern, Sr., a Swiss couple, worked for the Thebauds.  Their son, Edward Jr. was visting them and caught Mr. Thebaud’s eye. Edward was hired as Thebaud’s valet. The elder Kern had spent a year in the Tombs in 1895-1896 for swindling. Kern was also a small time crook. He had been convicted of forgery in Switzerland and under the name of Emil Brown he served a year for forgery. All of this was of course unknown to the Thebauds.

Edward Kern

 Edward Kern, Jr.

Pollion

Marie Pollion

Kern had met the wife of a French waiter, the lovely Madame Marie Pollion, in Switzerland in 1896.

They both ended up in New York, and resumed the affair. But he needed some cash to finance the escapade. After working a few weeks at the Thebauds, he knew that Mrs. Thebaud had a fortune in jewels.

On Saturday December 28, 1901, the Thebauds went to visit Willets in White Plains. Kern accompanied them, but returned to the city on the pretense of having forgotten the razors. He emptied the strongbox, which contained mostly stickpins (275 of them), but did not find the main jewels.

Kern put the jewels in a satchel, caught the 11:30 PM train to White Plains and fell asleep. Mr. Thebaud was also in town and boarded the same train and got into the same car. He saw Kern asleep with a satchel at his feet. Thebaud thought he should teach Kern a lesson about being careless, so he had a trainman hide the satchel. When Kern woke up, he explained to Thebaud that he had forgotten the razors and had returned to get them. He was horrified to discover the satchel missing. Thebaud gave him a reproof and handled the satchel back to Kern – the satchel, Thebaud later realized that contained his stolen stickpins.

Kern then took the other jewels, a pear-shaped diamond (worth $20,000 then, $500,000 in 2015 dollars) and a pearl ($15,000 then, $350,000 in 2015 dollars). On Sunday morning he feigned illness and was allowed to take the Willets’ horse and buggy to the station to get a train to see a doctor.

The Thebauds and the Willets went to mass. By the afternoon Kern had not returned, and Mrs. Thebaud looked for her jewels, and discovered her diamond and pearls were missing although a brooch valued at $50,000  ($1,500,000 in 2015 dollars)  was still there. She called the Madison Avenue townhouse, and the housekeeper discovered that the strong box was empty and the jewels gone.

The Thebauds called the police. A disconsolate Mr. Edward Pollion also came to the police. His neighbors had told him that his wife had run away with a young man, a valet , who had been a frequent visitor when Mr. Pollion was not home. Mrs. Pollion had not known (she later claimed) about the theft, but she agreed to go to a pawnshop with Kern and claim the jewels were hers. They got $700, all the cash the pawnbroker had on Sunday, on jewels valued at 30,000 and planned to escape to Switzerland. The police tracked and arrested Mrs. Pollion as she was biding farewell to friends. She had both her and Kern’s clothes with her. The pawnbroker, as soon as he had seen the account of the robbery, had called the police, police went to the pawnshop and recovered most of the the jewels that had been stolen.

The police identified Mrs. Pollion, Edward Kern, Sr. and Edward Kern, Jr. from the Rogues Gallery.

Kern met two fellow criminal, one of whom had met him at a race track and recognized him as the thief of the Thebaud jewels. Kern pled for silence and promised to split the loot. They traveled under assumed names, Theodore Manners (Kern), A. P. Howe, and P. Mars.

The three checked into a hotel in New Orleans. When Kern/Manners was out one evening, the other two asked that their trunks be brought down and checked out of the hotel. They later said they planned to have Kern file a claim for stolen property and get money from the hotel, but they either did not inform Kern of this plan or he forgot it – or, of course, they were lying. They went to two train stations to try to get a train out of town, but they were too late. They rowed a skiff across the Mississippi to Gretna and waited to catch the first morning train.

Meanwhile Manners-Kern returned to the hotel and discovered his fellow crooks and the loot gone. He reported the theft to the police. The police searched for the thieves, and a newsboy in Gretna reported two men were acting suspiciously.  The police arrived and arrested them and informed Manners-Kern that he could come to reclaim his possessions. He was reluctant.

When he confronted the other two, one said “You have turned us in, you scoundrel.” He told the police: “This is Edward Kern, valet and thief, who robbed Paul Thebaud in New York.” The police looked in the valise and found $2,500 of jewelry which matched the description of the Thebaud jewels. Kern insisted he was Theodore Manners from Chicago.

Paul Thebaud and one of New York’s finest, Detective Kelly, arrived in Gretna to identify Kern and reclaim the jewels. Rumor had gotten around that Thebaud had offered a $10,000 reward for the jewels, but this was only a rumor. The sheriff refused to release Kern until Thebaud forked over the $10,000, and Thebaud refused to do that, because he had never promised it.  Negotiations followed, and Thebaud made a gift of $250 to the Gretna police department.

Thebaud returned to New York, and Kelly and Kern were waiting in the train station to get the through train when Kelly spotted two pickpockets whom he knew, and lit off after them. He collared one immediately, and chased the other for half a mile before he collared him.

Kern pleaded guilty in April 1902 and got four and a half years in Sing Sing. The comrades who had gone off with his trunk were charged with theft, on the principle that thief one had priority over thief two. In June 1902 Kern tried to get them off by claiming that he had instructed them to take the trunk out of his room and meet him in Atlanta, where they were to divide the spoils or return his property. The judge was not impressed, and sentenced the two to three years of hard labor. After early release from Sing Sing, Kern resumed a spectacular career of con artistry , made the mistake of antagonizing William Randolph Hearst, and died in a hotel room after taking cyanide.

To add to the Thebauds’ troubles, at the same time the robbery was occurring the house that they were building caught fire and was totally destroyed. But Thebaud went ahead with new plans and built Hillair, which was completed in 1904.

Thebaud house 1

Thebaud House 2 Thebaud house 3Thebaud house 4Thebaud house 4 - Copy Thebaud house 5 - Copy Thebaud house 5 Thebaud house 6 Thebaud house 7

 

The Architectural Record had an extended description of Hillair:

The house itself, facing south, is seen a distance of several miles away, and is a fairly true example of Georgian architecture. The plan being symmetrical, a necessity in this style, it has the usual porch, but on the rear or south front, and not at the entrance which is on the north. The material from which “Hillair” is built is Indiana limestone of the gray variety the surface of the walls being of coursed ashlar. The original design shows a house of brick, with the same limestone trim, cornice and columns as now exist. The change to stone enhances the general good appearance, and is in fact more in keeping with the design. The semi- hexagonal “porte-cochere” on the north is a reasonable departure from the Georgian period, and is distinctly eclectic in character, but entirely reasonable in its purpose and form. The classical character of the period is well exhibited in the entablature and columns of the Ionic order, on every side of the house. The owner insisted on a veranda surrounding the entire plan etc. etc. etc.

All was not well in the Thebaud establishment. The firm failed in 1907 because of the failure of a corresponding firm in Central America, although the Thebauds’ personal fortune was not affected.

In 1907 another catastrophe hit the family, one which I will cover in the blog about Paul Gilbert Thebaud Jr.

Mr. and Mrs. Thebaud separated in 1911, and he gave her the house and $20,000,000 ($500,000,000 in 2013 dollars). He died in 1925.

Leave a Comment

Andrew Hutchins Mickle: Least Qualified Mayor of New York?

January 28, 2015 in Lawrence Family, Uncategorized No Comments Tags: Andrew Hutchins Mickle, chewing tobacco, G. B. Miller, Lawrence Family, Tammany

Andrew Hutchins Mickle

Andrew Hutchins Mickle was the husband of Mary Nicoll Lawrence, my wife’s third great-grand aunt. Mary Nicoll Lawrence (1822-1896) was the daughter of Judge Effingham Lawrence. Andrew Mickle, whose name means “Great” in Scots, was born on February 2, 1805 in the Sixth Ward. The Old Merchants of New York recounted of the house Mickle was born in:

We have watched for hours the honorable discipline of about twenty lusty porkers, who used to inhabit it, and went to regularly for grub in the morning, returned after sundown, and then marched upstairs t their place in the attic.

The Sixth Ward, which contained the notorious Five Points, was not as bad as it became later, and Mickle may have been pulling an Andrew Jackson in claiming low origins.

Andrew the Tobacconist 

G. B, Miller

The G.B. Miller firm was a premiere tobacco firm, founded in 1776. The records are a little confused, but it appears that Rose Miller grew four acres of tobacco in New Windsor,  and sold it as “Rose-Leaf Snuff and Tobacco.” The firm prospered, being run by George Benjamin Miller père et fils, and became renowned (and cursed) for its fine-cut chewing tobacco.  Andrew Mickle went to work for the younger G. B. Miller. Upon G. B. Miller’s death  in 1816 Mrs. Miller took over the business, and it prospered enough so that jokes were made about it:

Miller joke

Mrs. Miller became a byword for tobacco.

The Oneida community fought the use of tobacco, and finally everyone there renounced it:

“Good-bye Anderson, Lorrillard and Lillienthal. Your companionship, cosy as it is brings with it a bad smell. Good-bye, Mrs. G. B. Miller. Your charming influence does not render a man very acceptable to others of your sex. Thank God, the reign of yellow drizzle, spittoons, stale scents and ‘old-soldiers,’ is over! Thank God, the most vile, absurd, unclean, slave-driving tyranny that ever cursed humanity is hereabouts broken, and the insurrection is spreading!”

Andrew Mickle in 1827 married the Miller’s daughter, Caroline Augusta Miller (1810-1849). After her death he married Mary Nicoll Lawrence, the sister of Lydia Ann Lawrence,   By his first wife he had a daughter Hannah Mickle, who married William Effingham Lawrence, son of Judge Effingham Lawrence. William was Mary Nicoll Lawrence’s – Andrew Mickle’s wife – brother, and was therefore Andrew’s brother-in-law and son-in-law (and probably other things as well, but those are the closest relationships).

Andrew the Politician

Tammany put forward Andrew Mickle as their candidate. A historian of Tammany recounts:

“It was in 1846, just at this period of rampant Tammany corruption, which was beginning to  become somewhat too obvious, that Washington Irving returned to New York from Spain, where he had been Minister of the United States. He was received enthusiastically by the populace of New York, and Tammany joined vigorously in the welcome, for Tammany Hall needed a reputable man. The leaders of Tammany Hall offered Washington Irving the nomination for Mayor of New York. “It was not as a literary man especially that they desired to honor Irving,” wrote Mrs. Euphemia Vale Blake, “for they had always plenty of literary timber at hand, but partly for old association’s sake, and from their natural instinct to honor any man who had brought honor to America.”

Irving declined, and Tammany Hall nominated instead Andrew H. Mickle, who was  born in a hut in the “Bloody Sixth” Ward; it was said by his opponents that no less than a dozen pigs were present at the birth and lived with the family for many years.

Nathaniel Hubbard, a contemporary of Mickle’s , claims this is what really happened:

This election was bought of the sachems of Tammany hall, the tobacconist and mother–in-law  [Mrs. Russell, the mother of Andrew’s father-in-law] of the incumbent. She sent a letter to the rulers of Tammany with a pledge to give them $5.000 on condition they would nominate and elect her son in law to the office of mayor of this city. The bait was accepted and he was accordingly put in nomination and elected, and the $8,00 promptly paid.

He was a man utterly disqualified for the office of mayor, having been brought up behind the tobacco counter of Mrs. Russell.

Mickle was elected mayor in 1845 and served one term. A few things happened.

Great Explosion of 1845

Mickle encouraged the construction of a new workhouse and insane asylum, leading eventually to Blackwell’s Island becoming a sort of one-stop for all of New York’s undesirable industries.  After the Great Explosion of 1845, Mickle also saw to developing New York’s fire-fighting infrastructure.

Mickle gave $40.00 in the name of Tammany Hall to Irish relief during the Famine.

Mickle returned to the tobacco business in 1847.

Mickle tobacco

In 1848, upon the death of his mother-in-law, Andrew Mickle changed the name of the firm to A. H. Mickle and Sons. He built Bay Lawn, which burned in 1890.

Bay Lawn

At his death on January 25, 1863, Andrew left a fortune of over a million dollars (perhaps $30,000,000 in 2013 dollars).

Leave a Comment

Serving the Poor

January 25, 2015 in Protestantism 1 Comment Tags: Blaise Cupich, Gospel, poor, Protestants

 

 

Blaise Cupich

Blaise Cupich, the new archbishop of Chicago, was interviewed by Grant Gallicho of Commonweal.

Cupich acknowledged the decline in church attendance. He attributed it in art to the sexual abuse crisis and to secularism.

We have various areas within the Archdiocese of Chicago where birthrates are down, where people have moved out, and those neighborhoods have changed dramatically. Another part of it is that a lot of people have been impacted either by the sexual-abuse scandal or by the erosion of their spiritual life by secularism. But it’s also tied to a growing trend of people not wanting to identify with communities or organizations. Volunteerism is down. That cultural shift is part of the equation of declining church attendance.

His solution:

The way to do it is not by saying, “You’re not going to Mass and so there’s a problem.” Rather, we can say, “We have an opportunity to better society and to better the common good. We work for the poor. Come and work for the poor with us.”

Carlo Lancellotti commented:

 For me, the primary reason to be in the Church is to know and love Jesus Christ. A better society and the common good can be pursued in many other ways. Of course, some people may come to know Jesus through our good works, but evangelization cannot be carried out by presenting the Church as a “society of do-gooders.” Without calling into question in any way Archbishop Cupich’s deep faith and excellent intentions, it is always perplexing to me when I read a several-thousand words interview on various Church related topics and the words “faith” and “Jesus” never come up (except for two references to the “risen Christ” somewhere). It creates the misunderstanding that the emphasis is not on the communication of the faith (which seems to me the great challenge we face in Western countries) but on managing the life of the Church, promoting good works for the sake of good works, keeping people happy etc. There is ample evidence from the last half century that this approach is not even pastorally successful.

As Lancellotti noticed, Jesus is largely absent from Cupich’s remarks and his proposed solutions.

The Pew Foundation’s survey of religion in Latin America found that Catholics thought it was more important to help with poor with charitywork than to preach the Gospel and to bring people to Jesus; Protestants thought the reverse.

Pew Survey 1

 

But Protestants in fact helped the poor more than Catholics did:

Pew Survey 2

Faith in Jesus, the type found in charismatic and Evangelical Protestants, is a more powerful motive to serving God’s poor than generic do-goodism is.

Leave a Comment

The Hicksite-Orthodox Split in the Quakers

January 25, 2015 in Lawrence Family, Quakers, Spiritualism No Comments Tags: Elias Hicks, Hicksites, Inner Light, Lawrence Family, Quakers, Spiritualism

George Fox

The Quakers have not been immune from factionalism and the split affected the Lawrence family in several ways. It speeded their conversion to Episcopalianism, because the prohibition against marrying out was applied to different branches of Quakers.

Divisions of the Religious Society of Friends
Orthodox
Wilburite
Conservative Conservative Friends
Gurneyite
Gurneyite Friends United Meeting
Evangelical Evangelical Friends International
Beaconite
Hicksite
Friends General Conference Friends General Conference

Wikipedia’s comments seems fair:

During and after the English Civil War (1642–1651) many dissenting Christian groups emerged, including the Seekers and others. A young man named George Fox was dissatisfied by the teachings of the Church of England and non-conformists. He had a revelation that there is one, even, Christ Jesus, who can speak to thy condition.

Quakers (or Friends, as they refer to themselves) are members of a family of religious movements collectively known as the Religious Society of Friends. The central unifying doctrine of these movements is the priesthood of all believers.

They include those with evangelical, holiness, liberal, and traditional conservative Quaker understandings of Christianity. Unlike many other groups that emerged within Christianity, the Religious Society of Friends has actively tried to avoid creeds and hierarchical structures.

The Hicksite variety influenced the Lawrence family.

Elias Hicks

Elias Hicks (1748-1830) stressed the role of the Inner Light. “the immediate Communion of the human soul with its Divine Creator and Savior.” as one follower explained it. The Inner Light was equal to or even superior to Scripture:

With the teaching that the Inner Light was on par with the revelation of Jesus from the Bible, Hicksite Quakers removed those boundaries and transformed Quaker religious praxis, distancing it from Bible reading and prayer, and recognizing an ongoing personal reformation through experience in the world. An individual acting in the world could experience Jesus in the same way as someone kneeling in prayer  or readng the Bible. Such an understanding tended to minimize the importance of Bible-reading and prayer and sacralized Quaker social action.

Hicks was himself an abolitionist and denounced slavery as the result of war. He wanted to see a boycott of slave-produced goods. This inspired the setting up of stores that sold only products produced by free labor.The first was in Baltimore.

Hicks’s teachings led to a split in the Quakers:

The “great separation” of 1827-28 began in Philadelphia Yearly Meeting. Approximately two-thirds of members ranged themselves in the group that came to be called “Hicksite,” and emphasized the role of the Inward Light in guiding individual faith and conscience, while the remaining third, eventually known as “Orthodox,” espoused a more Protestant emphasis on Biblical authority and the atonement. Similar schisms rapidly followed in New York, Baltimore, and elsewhere.

The  Lawrences did not go in the direction of social activism. In some of them as we shall see, the Hicksite emphasis on the Inner Light fed into Spiritualism. This influence has continued. Mary Coelho, from her Quaker background and from her studies at Union Theological and Fordham, developed her understanding of the Inner Light:

The adults in our Quaker community spoke often of the Inner Light, the seed of God, the indwelling Christ. “It is a Light within, a dynamic center, a creative Life that presses to birth within us.” The Inner Light might be found in the worshiping community, where it would move a person to speak. The Inner Light might lead a young man to refuse to go to war. It might call someone to alleviate suffering or injustice, and then give them the power to accomplish that task. People testify that through the power of this Light, evil weakens in them and the good is raised up.

For example, a mystical experience at age 29 launched me — rather, hurled and compelled me — into a search that continues to this day. For I had come to know experientially of a powerfully healing and attractive dimension of life not addressed in my science classes. Although not an experience of light, it was an experience of the sacred, and thus closely related to experiences of the Inner Light. I had an inner knowledge, unacceptable as it seems rationally, that what I had known was, in some manner, an answer to humanity’s problems.

I thereby learned to honor the mystical side of Quakerism and to see it as part of a far older tradition that takes as its foundation the experiential side of the religious life. But it was the new story of the evolutionary universe — specifically, the scientific story as translated by Brian Swimme — that enabled me to integrate the manifest, physical world into a dynamic, sacred whole.

It is possible that there are leadings about events not derived from the usual means of communication, although familiarity with a situation through normal means of communication may stimulate an emotional engagement that, in turn, brings forth leadings to address that particular state of affairs. Physicists have, after all, discovered nonlocality, which is action (at the subatomic level) in the absence of local forces. A story told by Jean Shenida Bolen illustrates the kind of nonlocal interconnections in the realm of the individual consciousness that exist in this mysterious world of ours.

As a young child, Jean lived in California with her parents, who were from Japan. On occasion her father would awaken saying that so-and-so back in Japan had died, and that he learned this in a dream. A couple of weeks later, a letter would arrive saying that indeed that person had died at the time her father had known it. How was that knowing, that “leading” possible?

According to M. L. Rowntree, at its best, the Light is the whole self in touch with God and with the universe (quoted in Lucas, p. 16). Such full participation in the universe can bring the individual into leadings that arise outside our local, daily consciousness. The new cosmology gives us confidence that our leadings or callings may go beyond an individual’s isolated ideas, and that a person can be led to actions that do indeed reflect the needs and direction of the larger community and the evolving earth. Likewise, the Quaker idea that refusal of a concern has cosmic consequences finds support in the context of the web of interconnections that is the unfolding whole.

This was the path that Lydia Ann Lawrence (1811-1879), my wife’s third great grandmother, followed.

Inner Light Church

 

 

Leave a Comment
«< 29 30 31 32 33 >»

Subscribe


 

Categories

RECENT ENTRIES

  • The Hands That Restored Notre Dame
  • Misinformation c. 1900
  • The Spirits Among Us
  • (no title)
  • Jewish Safety in Europe, East and West
  • Unamuno and the Eternal Journey into God
  • Unamuno and Universal Salvation
  • Recovery
  • Elizabeth Lawrence Gilman
  • James H. Rutter

Blogroll

  • A Twitch Upon the Thread
  • Abuse Tracker
  • All Things Catholic
  • American Papist
  • Ampersand
  • Catholic and Enjoying It
  • Catholic Culture
  • Catholic Edition
  • Catholic Online
  • Christianity Today
  • Disputations
  • DotCommonweal
  • First Principles
  • First Things – On The Square
  • Front Porch Republic
  • GetReligion
  • InsideCatholic
  • Kath.net
  • Mere Comments
  • National Catholic Register
  • National Catholic Reporter
  • New Oxford Review
  • NovAntiqua
  • Patrick Madrid
  • Pontifications
  • Reditus a Chronicle of Aesthetic Christianity
  • Rod Dreher Crunchy Con
  • Ross Douthat
  • Stephenscom
  • The Catholic Thing
  • The Crossland Foundation
  • The Curious Gaze
  • Via Media
  • Whispers in the Loggia

Reviews and Comments of Podles' new book: SACRILEGE

  • Julia Duin, of The Washington Times, on Lee Podles’ Sacrilege
Leon J. Podles :: DIALOGUE
© Leon J. Podles :: DIALOGUE 2025
Powered by WordPress • Themify WordPress Themes

↑ Back to top